<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Kills Boss Engine For Mustang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/</link>
	<description>Ford Mustang Web Site with Mustang Forums for discussing the Ford Mustang with other Mustang Enthusiasts, Mustang Articles and Mustang News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:40:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: newtonfarmer920</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>newtonfarmer920</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>ford is trying to come out with a program where they put twin-turbos-chargers on all of their engine.  ford is talking about 35-mpg of better for all the engines, because of the 2030 or so emissions mandate for all cars made that year and later to hasve 35-mpg or better gas mileage.  anyone know the name for that program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ford is trying to come out with a program where they put twin-turbos-chargers on all of their engine.  ford is talking about 35-mpg of better for all the engines, because of the 2030 or so emissions mandate for all cars made that year and later to hasve 35-mpg or better gas mileage.  anyone know the name for that program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpectorV</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>SpectorV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>It does suck but... at least we got some retro style cars and good performance numbers before gas got to expensive and ruined everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does suck but&#8230; at least we got some retro style cars and good performance numbers before gas got to expensive and ruined everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: project_v6</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>project_v6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Maybe an automatic throttle in the exhaust would also calibrate the tune under 4 cylinder mode? 

Just my 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe an automatic throttle in the exhaust would also calibrate the tune under 4 cylinder mode? </p>
<p>Just my 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redfire281</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Redfire281</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm...with displacement on demand, I wonder what my Corsa exhaust would sound like in 4 cylinder mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230;with displacement on demand, I wonder what my Corsa exhaust would sound like in 4 cylinder mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: project_v6</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>project_v6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>They need to find out a way to increase fuel efficiency for future V8. Automatic shut off of 4 cylinders (out of the 8 cylinders) during highway cruising and during traffic is a very nice option. Weight reduction and reducing air drag is also a nice option. There are really a lot of possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to find out a way to increase fuel efficiency for future V8. Automatic shut off of 4 cylinders (out of the 8 cylinders) during highway cruising and during traffic is a very nice option. Weight reduction and reducing air drag is also a nice option. There are really a lot of possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mustangfan2003</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mustangfan2003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>i think the next gen mustang wasn&#039;t going to get an engine larger then a 5.0 anyway.  i know it sucks but it&#039;s not a good time to invest in large engines at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the next gen mustang wasn&#8217;t going to get an engine larger then a 5.0 anyway.  i know it sucks but it&#8217;s not a good time to invest in large engines at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mustanggt</title>
		<link>http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>mustanggt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mustangevolution.com/20080623706/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s 1974 all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s 1974 all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
