stock v6 coupe times? - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > Pre-2005 V6 Mustang



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 01-12-2005, 05:17 PM   #1
Legacy Member
Legacy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Region: Florida
Posts: 595
Send a message via AIM to tedness
stock v6 coupe times?

ok i found all those stupids lists with stock vehicle times, but none of them listed the stock time for a 1999 mustang v6 coupe. they all said convertible times.

i know there is some difference, even if minimal, because of the extra 200lbs the convertible carries around. so i wanted to know how much it affected the coupe without that weight.

so if anyone has any insight into the quarter mile and 0-60 times lemme know.
__________________
tedness is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-12-2005, 06:54 PM   #2
Registered Member
Regular
 
Dark02Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 1,527
Send a message via AIM to Dark02Pony
automatic is around 16.7 and a 5spd with the right driver is capible of high 15s
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...rtandgrill.jpg
Operation: Evolutionization.......Member #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonteCitan
Ford Motor Company = FoMoCo..
what does that make Honda Motor Company????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole
Mineral Gray is such a hott color. Much better then orange
Dark02Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 07:14 PM   #3
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
Wow almost a whole second just from manual to automatic? The times always change depending on where you are. People on the east coast tend to get better times than people on the west coast. In your case, at least stereotypically, it would be very humid when you ran so it may be a little off. The only way to really know is to take it to a track. And although everyone always says "it depends on the driver" everyone already knows that and you're just looking for base times which have previously been provided. I would just expect yours to be slightly slower depending on the weather. If you go now while it's cold they'll be slightly faster.
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-12-2005, 07:21 PM   #4
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
Just like you said I could only find convertibles on the list, the only non-convertible one they had was the 95'. The first number is 0-60 second is quarter mile

1999 Ford Mustang Convertible V6 8.6 16.5
1995 Ford Mustang 9.9 17.3
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 07:31 PM   #5
Registered Member
Regular
 
Dark02Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 1,527
Send a message via AIM to Dark02Pony
Quote:
Originally Posted by red herring
Wow almost a whole second just from manual to automatic?
yea ive seen a stock vs stock just manual and automatic being the differance, auto run 16.7 and the manual a 15.9 over here on east coast as u were talkin bout..but of course the driver plays a big part
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...rtandgrill.jpg
Operation: Evolutionization.......Member #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonteCitan
Ford Motor Company = FoMoCo..
what does that make Honda Motor Company????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole
Mineral Gray is such a hott color. Much better then orange
Dark02Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 07:49 PM   #6
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark02Pony
yea ive seen a stock vs stock just manual and automatic being the differance, auto run 16.7 and the manual a 15.9 over here on east coast as u were talkin bout..but of course the driver plays a big part
All the more reason to get a manual. I expect next time we go to the drag strip by my house (west coast) the 2004 v6 mustang will run a 16.4 or so, we'll see how close I am to being correct. California sucks for that kinda stuff.
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 07:53 PM   #7
Registered Member
Regular
 
Dark02Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 1,527
Send a message via AIM to Dark02Pony
yeah i needa run and get my times im hoping to get like you said , 16.4 atleast ill have a few more mods by then though so we'll see what happens
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...rtandgrill.jpg
Operation: Evolutionization.......Member #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonteCitan
Ford Motor Company = FoMoCo..
what does that make Honda Motor Company????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicole
Mineral Gray is such a hott color. Much better then orange
Dark02Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 08:13 PM   #8
Legacy Member
Legacy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Region: Florida
Posts: 595
Send a message via AIM to tedness
Quote:
Originally Posted by red herring
Just like you said I could only find convertibles on the list, the only non-convertible one they had was the 95'. The first number is 0-60 second is quarter mile

1999 Ford Mustang Convertible V6 8.6 16.5
1995 Ford Mustang 9.9 17.3
ya. too innacurate considering the '99 up put out about 40 more horses.

but would that 200lbs really make half a second difference between the times?
__________________
tedness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 08:15 PM   #9
Registered Member
Regular
 
timpryor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Region: Texas
Posts: 676
i have exhuast and intake and i run 16.2@85's all day long
__________________
"The LORD shall judge the people:judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to mine integrity that is in me." PSALM 7:8

In Texas? check out www.lonestarstangs.com
timpryor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 08:17 PM   #10
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedness
ya. too innacurate considering the '99 up put out about 40 more horses.

but would that 200lbs really make half a second difference between the times?
I wouldn't count on 200lbs making 1/2 a second difference, but it might be close. Just imagine if you had another male passenger what would you run? probably 2/10 slower maybe 3. Those lists are always inaccurate but I posted em anyway because they don't just make those numbers up, somebody ran em.
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 08:45 PM   #11
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 187
as a general rule, for every 100 lbs of weight added or taken off will add or take off .1 seconds. its not a perfect science but its a pretty good general rule. it might be a half second for the convertable AOD tranny. but of course it all depends on the driver.
bigpomps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 08:46 PM   #12
Registered User
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Region: California
Posts: 3
14.01 here with 75hp n20 added

2000 mustangv6 convertible automatic... 1.8 -60ft, .445r/t 8.9- 1/8 at 98 mph without stripping and with 17x11 chrome wheels... with at least 3650 lbs.
yldstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 09:20 PM   #13
Moderator Emeritus
Legacy
Regular
 
SpectorV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Region: Alabama
Posts: 26,049
Send a message via AIM to SpectorV
15.5 manual 16.0 auto give or take .3 probably give.... lol
__________________
2003 Cobra Vert (Redfire) #3938 of 5082 @ 05/27/2003
472rwhp/493rwtq -Modification List - Dyno Sheet
2012 Mustang 3.7L M6 (Kona Blue)
2011 Ford Edge Sport (Red Metallic)
SpectorV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 10:09 PM   #14
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
Quote:
Originally Posted by yldstang
2000 mustangv6 convertible automatic... 1.8 -60ft, .445r/t 8.9- 1/8 at 98 mph without stripping and with 17x11 chrome wheels... with at least 3650 lbs.
1.8 60ft. with an auto v6? Thats pretty good. Plus you can do the 1/8 at 98m.p.h.? That's pretty good too.
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2005, 10:58 PM   #15
Registered Member
Regular
 
timpryor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Region: Texas
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by red herring
1.8 60ft. with an auto v6? Thats pretty good. Plus you can do the 1/8 at 98m.p.h.? That's pretty good too.
thats with a 75 shot too

look for around 16.2's your 1st night.

I'll be dropping at least a second off my ET sometime fairly soon
__________________
"The LORD shall judge the people:judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to mine integrity that is in me." PSALM 7:8

In Texas? check out www.lonestarstangs.com
timpryor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 05:23 PM   #16
Legacy Member
Legacy
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Region: Illinois
Posts: 1,160
Those estimates are fairly close.

Differences will be Altitude, weather conditions, & driver skill.
__________________
Custom Delk motor now DOA
2003 SVT Lightning #1059 of 4270
2000 Vert 4R70W
Only buy from vendors that test and stand behind their products
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 07:17 PM   #17
Moderator Emeritus
Legacy
Regular
 
SpectorV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Region: Alabama
Posts: 26,049
Send a message via AIM to SpectorV
you wont do a 1.8 with a stock rear suspension and an auto the stock/street tires cant handle it.
__________________
2003 Cobra Vert (Redfire) #3938 of 5082 @ 05/27/2003
472rwhp/493rwtq -Modification List - Dyno Sheet
2012 Mustang 3.7L M6 (Kona Blue)
2011 Ford Edge Sport (Red Metallic)
SpectorV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 10:37 PM   #18
Legacy Member
Legacy
 
slvr2000stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Region: Illinois
Posts: 1,160
I have done a 2.0 with the 3.73's. We will see what the 4.10's bring.
__________________
Custom Delk motor now DOA
2003 SVT Lightning #1059 of 4270
2000 Vert 4R70W
Only buy from vendors that test and stand behind their products
slvr2000stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2005, 03:17 AM   #19
Registered Member
Regular
 
red herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Region: California
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to red herring
4.1 is so high. I'm excited to see what I can do in my car with the 3.91 though, but even that seems extraordinarily high
red herring is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > Pre-2005 V6 Mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: Stock coil springs and stock mufflers for '96 GT inaba116 Mustang Parts for Sale and Wanted 6 02-15-2006 10:19 PM
Stock 03/04 Cobra vs Stock LS1 PureVenom The Bar 46 05-08-2005 06:41 PM
E.T. Times Js281GT 1996-2004 Mustang GT 14 03-02-2005 03:00 AM
Installing a stock V8 on my stock V6 EXHAUST mrshoss97V6 Pre-2005 V6 Mustang 3 06-30-2004 01:43 PM

» Like Us On Facebook



12:25 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.