Ecu on a 302 to a 306 - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2014 Mustang GT > 1979-1995 Mustang GT

Join Mustang Evolution Today

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 05-13-2012, 10:21 PM   #1
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
Ecu on a 302 to a 306

If I bore my motor out to a 306 what if any work will need t be done web it comes to the ecu?

Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 10:42 PM   #2
Registered User
Regular
 
NeedSomeMods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 777
NeedSomeMods is unknown around these parts
I would suggest a custom dyno tune, especially if it's for the sn95 5.0. Your stock computer will work, but adjustments to timing curve, A/F ratio, etc. must be made for it to run at it's full potential.

__________________
2000 V6 - RIP
The '94 -
NeedSomeMods is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 10:51 PM   #3
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
Thanks ! How much does a dyno tune usually cost ?
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 11:17 PM   #4
Registered User
Regular
 
vinnygt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 670
vinnygt is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm13_5.0
Thanks ! How much does a dyno tune usually cost ?
Usually around 400-500 depending on who's doing it and what area
vinnygt is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:28 AM   #5
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
That's not too hatefull, I thought it be worse ... I've herd it will make your car run better then ever
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:54 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
Just boring will not require a tune. But with the other upgrades you have been talking about it may.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:13 AM   #7
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
I mean gotta be done gotta be done ! Long as its not a waste
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:29 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
Like I said. If you did a stock rebuild .030 over. Then don't do it. If you do hci then well worth it.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:36 AM   #9
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
I plan on hci just to do it all at once ..
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 11:04 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 278
tbonestang is unknown around these parts
For the time and money I would just do a 331 and cal it a day
tbonestang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 01:04 PM   #11
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
But I kinda have to worry about ffuel milage a lil bit
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 02:05 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
If your motor is properly built with the right parts then I wouldn't worry to much about mpgs. They won't change to much.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:18 AM   #13
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
Sweet that's always good to hear lol

---------- Post added at 09:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 AM ----------

I got 20 off my last tank
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:35 AM   #14
Senior Member
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,786
Trojan Horse is just getting started.
Re: Ecu on a 302 to a 306

A better performing engine is usually more efficient.The big losses in fuel mileage are usually caused by poor tuning and/or a heavy right foot.


Driven conservatively I can eke around 24- 26 MPG out of my much modified 86' GT.
__________________
Trojan Horse is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:37 AM   #15
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
So the HCI and 306 rebuild if it's done right won't kill my fuel milage ?
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:45 AM   #16
Senior Member
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,786
Trojan Horse is just getting started.
Re: Ecu on a 302 to a 306

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm13_5.0 View Post
So the HCI and 306 rebuild if it's done right won't kill my fuel milage ?
Nope.


I don't know what my car was capable of before all the mods, but I doubt it was much if any better.
__________________
Trojan Horse is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:46 AM   #17
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
This is good to hear
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 03:28 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trojan Horse
A better performing engine is usually more efficient.The big losses in fuel mileage are usually caused by poor tuning and/or a heavy right foot.

Driven conservatively I can eke around 24- 26 MPG out of my much modified 86' GT.
but you forgot to mentioned, with a more modified motor its harder to keep the foot out of it.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 03:58 PM   #19
Senior Member
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,786
Trojan Horse is just getting started.
Re: Ecu on a 302 to a 306

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamstang View Post
but you forgot to mentioned, with a more modified motor its harder to keep the foot out of it.
Yeah, there is that issue to contend with.
__________________
Trojan Horse is offline  
Old 05-16-2012, 09:19 PM   #20
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
True that!
Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 09:02 PM   #21
Registered User
Regular
 
WhiteCobra94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,249
WhiteCobra94 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm13_5.0
Thanks ! How much does a dyno tune usually cost ?
My car was dynoed 3 weeks ago and cost me $450 but I already had a chip from SCT so if you need to buy the chip too your looking closer to $600 for Chip and custom tune!!
WhiteCobra94 is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 12:47 AM   #22
Registered User
Regular
 
Storm13_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 339
Storm13_5.0 is unknown around these parts
Damn.. Not too cheap..

Storm13_5.0 is offline  
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2014 Mustang GT > 1979-1995 Mustang GT

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off





» Like Us On Facebook


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


11:21 PM



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0