compression question - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2014 Mustang GT > 1979-1995 Mustang GT

Join Mustang Evolution Today

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 05-14-2012, 07:07 PM   #1
Registered User
Regular
 
93_347foxbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 399
93_347foxbody is unknown around these parts
compression question

whats the advantage of having higher or lower compression? i know ive heard somewhere(i could be wrong) but you needed something like 9:1 compression to run forced induction, i currently am running 12.5:1 compression according to the guy that built the motor. is that good or bad or doesnt make a difference. and if its true that youll need something like 9:1 compression for forced induction how do you change it? and one last question that doesnt have much to do with compression but more so forced induction, i also read somewhere that b303 cams arent the greatest pick for forced induction or something like that. can anyone clearify that if im wrong on any of this

---------- Post added at 09:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 PM ----------

and i also read just now that you cant run 12.5:1 compression with pump gas dont know if thats true or not but the guy swears its 12.5:1 and it runs on pump gas

93_347foxbody is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:33 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
if you have a high compression ratio it is most likely because you have heads with tiny combustion chambers either because of shaved heads or domed pistons etc.

12.5 is pretty high to run FI on. the recommended is about 9:1. but you maybe able to get away with more with a lower boost setup.

now there maybe a couple things you can do. these might seem like a pita, but if you are going to properly prep your block. you will be inside the motor anyways.
you can change the pistons to dish type.
you can run a little thicker head gasket. but i dont think you can get one big enough to drop your compression that much, or would want to run one that thick.
or you can get heads with bigger combustion chambers.

now i am not to sure on being able to run on pump gas or not. i suppose if you were really conservative on your timing it may be possible. but i cant be certain on this. as long as there wasnt any detonation/pinging noises i dont think i would worry to much. you can check your timing for chits and see what its set at. and there maybe other factors on this topic.

dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:42 PM   #3
Registered User
Regular
 
93_347foxbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 399
93_347foxbody is unknown around these parts
Re: compression question

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamstang View Post
if you have a high compression ratio it is most likely because you have heads with tiny combustion chambers either because of shaved heads or domed pistons etc.

12.5 is pretty high to run FI on. the recommended is about 9:1. but you maybe able to get away with more with a lower boost setup.

now there maybe a couple things you can do. these might seem like a pita, but if you are going to properly prep your block. you will be inside the motor anyways.
you can change the pistons to dish type.
you can run a little thicker head gasket. but i dont think you can get one big enough to drop your compression that much, or would want to run one that thick.
or you can get heads with bigger combustion chambers.

now i am not to sure on being able to run on pump gas or not. i suppose if you were really conservative on your timing it may be possible. but i cant be certain on this. as long as there wasnt any detonation/pinging noises i dont think i would worry to much. you can check your timing for chits and see what its set at. and there maybe other factors on this topic.
im running a carb setup not efi idk if that changes anything and when the guy first built the motor he had a procharger on it idk if he messed with compression after that or not and and how do i check mmy timing for chits? i aslo have a gear drive and no chain
93_347foxbody is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:46 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
none of that stuff you mentioned affects compression ratio. i cant be certain but i suppose if the bottom end is built near bullet proof it maybe possible to run that high of com ratio with FI.

i meant check timing for $hits. you need a timing light. and it is very easy. this wont help in finding your compression ratio or anything. it just may give a clue as to thats why you dont need higher octane fuel. which may or not even be neccesary.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:50 PM   #5
Registered User
Regular
 
93_347foxbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 399
93_347foxbody is unknown around these parts
Re: compression question

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamstang View Post
none of that stuff you mentioned affects compression ratio. i cant be certain but i suppose if the bottom end is built near bullet proof it maybe possible to run that high of com ratio with FI.

i meant check timing for $hits. you need a timing light. and it is very easy. this wont help in finding your compression ratio or anything. it just may give a clue as to thats why you dont need higher octane fuel. which may or not even be neccesary.
ok wait whats FI lol
93_347foxbody is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:50 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
forced induction lol
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:51 PM   #7
Senior Member
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,786
Trojan Horse is just getting started.
Re: compression question

I don't think you are running 12.5:1 compression on pump gas.

Even with aluminum heads your timing would have to be so retarded that it would be a slug to keep it from detonating and destroying the engine.

You can sometimes get away with as high as 11:1 with aluminum heads and conservative timing, but 12.5:1 is just too high for pump gas.
__________________
Trojan Horse is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:53 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trojan Horse
I don't think you are running 12.5:1 compression on pump gas.Even with aluminum heads your timing would have to be so retarded that it would be a slug to keep it from detonating and destroying the engine.

You can sometimes get away with as high as 11:1 with aluminum heads and conservative timing, but 12.5:1 is just too high for pump gas.
i was waiting for you to hop in here. because i wasnt sure or that part.

---------- Post added at 08:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------

thats the problem with buying a used car. is you never know if the seller is telling the truth.
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:57 PM   #9
Forum Car Trader
Regular
 
90GTNovi2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,154
90GTNovi2000 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93_347foxbody
whats the advantage of having higher or lower compression? i know ive heard somewhere(i could be wrong) but you needed something like 9:1 compression to run forced induction, i currently am running 12.5:1 compression according to the guy that built the motor. is that good or bad or doesnt make a difference. and if its true that youll need something like 9:1 compression for forced induction how do you change it? and one last question that doesnt have much to do with compression but more so forced induction, i also read somewhere that b303 cams arent the greatest pick for forced induction or something like that. can anyone clearify that if im wrong on any of this

---------- Post added at 09:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 PM ----------

and i also read just now that you cant run 12.5:1 compression with pump gas dont know if thats true or not but the guy swears its 12.5:1 and it runs on pump gas
To answer your question about the bcam it wouldn't be my first choice of FI cam but it works very very well with my combo and is very street able and gives that nice choppy lope.. I wouldn't mind a fcam but honestly this combo is amazing 425rwhp with bcam and AFR 165 heads..
__________________
90GTNovi2000 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:01 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,086
dreamstang is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90GTNovi2000

To answer your question about the bcam it wouldn't be my first choice of FI cam but it works very very well with my combo and is very street able and gives that nice choppy lope.. I wouldn't mind a fcam but honestly this combo is amazing 425rwhp with bcam and AFR 165 heads..
i agree. when i was originally planning to put a s/c on my car i read some people saying not to run a bcam with FI. but i was able to dig up a few people who where running it and were pleased with there results. so i had made the decision at that time to keep that cam. but i ended up not going that route yet. but maybe one day i will have that roots blower i have been dreaming about. :drool:
dreamstang is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:54 PM   #11
Registered User
Regular
 
93_347foxbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 399
93_347foxbody is unknown around these parts
Re: compression question

thanks for clearing this up bc the previous owner insists on 12.5:1 but when i was reading about it everything says its not possible. and whats a good compression for forced induction or a necessary compression
93_347foxbody is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 09:05 PM   #12
Forum Car Trader
Regular
 
90GTNovi2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,154
90GTNovi2000 is unknown around these parts
Also on that note. I would like to kinda know my compression if possible. My pistons are TRW's L2305 .030 with AFR 165 heads they have been milled 15 thousandths..
__________________
90GTNovi2000 is offline  
Old 05-15-2012, 05:56 AM   #13
Senior Member
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,786
Trojan Horse is just getting started.
Re: compression question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 93_347foxbody View Post
thanks for clearing this up bc the previous owner insists on 12.5:1 but when i was reading about it everything says its not possible. and whats a good compression for forced induction or a necessary compression
The rule used to be 8 to 8.5:1 compression for forced induction. Nowadays you can get by with higher compression, but note that you may not be able to add as much boost as you could with a lower compression engine. To keep the off boost power up I would start with a 9 - 9.5:1 compression myself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 90GTNovi2000 View Post
Also on that note. I would like to kinda know my compression if possible. My pistons are TRW's L2305 .030 with AFR 165 heads they have been milled 15 thousandths..
Compression is difficult to figure with the engine put together.
If you have all of the information you can use a Compression Calculator.

__________________
Trojan Horse is offline  
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2014 Mustang GT > 1979-1995 Mustang GT

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off





» Like Us On Facebook


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


10:45 PM



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0