2005 mustang gt best supercharger on stockblock and internals - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 2005-2010 Mustang GT



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 04-14-2013, 01:12 PM   #1
Registered Member
Regular
 
Ahmed ali khan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Region: Other
Posts: 149
2005 mustang gt best supercharger on stockblock and internals

Hello everyone

I am planning to supercharge my mustang 3v 4.6L V8 it has 12000km on it.
But i wana be safe on the block

I am planning to get between these brands
1) KB stage 1 on 8.5psi
2) roush m90 with pulley update to 8psi
3) ford racing whipple intercooled 11psi with ford tune is the tune safe? If yes then il go with it
Otherwise with non intercooled kit

I dont wana go with vortec or procharger or other types of SC.

I will built motor later so right now please help me finding a good supercharger with power and brand with relaible tune and setup

I will add slicks and headers xpipe catback
Clutch
Right now aiming high 11s run like 11.9secs would be fine for me:p

So please help me
Help will b appriciated tc
Ahmed ali khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-14-2013, 02:26 PM   #2
Registered Member
Regular
 
Luna1994's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Salt Lake City
Region: Utah
Posts: 805
Goof 11 sec 05 mustang gt and you'll see a link saying how we got are gt into the 11 sec and the parts they used are cheaper then a super charger
Luna1994 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 02:48 PM   #3
Registered Member
Regular
 
maldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Region: Nevada
Posts: 1,563
ROUSH
__________________
2006 Mustang GT Premium RedFire. CAI, SLP Loudmouth, SCT Progammer, 5 speed manual trans. My other car is a CORVETTE!
maldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-15-2013, 07:57 AM   #4
Registered Member
Regular
 
Bennyhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: Canada
Posts: 275
M90 not worth it! I have one. 9psi is maxed out!
Bennyhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 08:43 AM   #5
Registered Member
Regular
 
Wolverine0587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Copperas Cove
Region: Texas
Posts: 359
The M90 is about a complete waste haha!
Wolverine0587 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 02:00 PM   #6
Registered Member
Regular
 
2013mustang5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cream ridge
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmed ali khan View Post
Hello everyone

I am planning to supercharge my mustang 3v 4.6L V8 it has 12000km on it.
But i wana be safe on the block

I am planning to get between these brands
1) KB stage 1 on 8.5psi
2) roush m90 with pulley update to 8psi
3) ford racing whipple intercooled 11psi with ford tune is the tune safe? If yes then il go with it
Otherwise with non intercooled kit

I dont wana go with vortec or procharger or other types of SC.

I will built motor later so right now please help me finding a good supercharger with power and brand with relaible tune and setup

I will add slicks and headers xpipe catback
Clutch
Right now aiming high 11s run like 11.9secs would be fine for me:p

So please help me
Help will b appriciated tc
KB supercharger is THE BEST. Also if your looking to run 11 seconds you don't need a supercharger, just get full bolt ons and prob run 11.5- high 10s
__________________
2013 mustang 5.0 track pack(first mustang)
2013mustang5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 02:05 PM   #7
Registered Member
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Region: Texas
Posts: 9,253
Either slap a turbo on it or a bottle. You will be a lot more pleased with either of those compared to a supercharger.
Rapinator126 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 03:06 PM   #8
Registered Member
Regular
 
Aggiesrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bryan
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapinator126 View Post
Either slap a turbo on it or a bottle. You will be a lot more pleased with either of those compared to a supercharger.
Just curious as to why you prefer turbo to SC?
__________________
chevy runs deep, Don't step in chevy!

289 - Holley 4150 570cfm; Performer intake; mild cam; MSD HEI; 302 heads; Roller Tips; Hedman Tri-Y headers; H-pipe w/Flowmaster 40's; 9 in posi 3.50; 205/50-17F; 225/50-17R.
Aggiesrok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 03:13 PM   #9
Registered Member
Regular
 
2013mustang5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cream ridge
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggiesrok View Post

Just curious as to why you prefer turbo to SC?
Turbos are more effecent, also produce more power alot of the time
__________________
2013 mustang 5.0 track pack(first mustang)
2013mustang5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 04:18 PM   #10
Registered Member
Regular
 
245ciPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: New York
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013mustang5.0 View Post

Turbos are more effecent, also produce more power alot of the time
Where would I look for a reasonably priced turbo kit?
245ciPony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 04:21 PM   #11
Registered Member
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Region: Texas
Posts: 9,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by 245ciPony View Post

Where would I look for a reasonably priced turbo kit?
On3performance. And yes it's a good kit it's cheap priced. My buddy had there 76mm single at 24psi.
Rapinator126 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 05:10 PM   #12
Registered Member
Regular
 
245ciPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: New York
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapinator126 View Post

On3performance. And yes it's a good kit it's cheap priced. My buddy had there 76mm single at 24psi.
What's a cheap price? I didn't see one posted.
245ciPony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 05:46 PM   #13
Registered Member
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Region: Texas
Posts: 9,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by 245ciPony View Post

What's a cheap price? I didn't see one posted.
Complete kit from on3 in $1,999.00.
Rapinator126 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 08:05 AM   #14
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapinator126 View Post

On3performance. And yes it's a good kit it's cheap priced. My buddy had there 76mm single at 24psi.
+1
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 01:17 PM   #15
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013mustang5.0 View Post
KB supercharger is THE BEST. Also if your looking to run 11 seconds you don't need a supercharger, just get full bolt ons and prob run 11.5- high 10s
No. A 5.0, maybe. Not a 3V. Once you add cams and heads, it isn't bolt ons.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 01:50 PM   #16
Registered Member
Regular
 
2013mustang5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cream ridge
Region: New Jersey
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

No. A 5.0, maybe. Not a 3V. Once you add cams and heads, it isn't bolt ons.
My friends 04 gt ran a 11.4 with full bolt ons and tires
__________________
2013 mustang 5.0 track pack(first mustang)
2013mustang5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 01:55 PM   #17
Registered Member
Regular
 
Venomouz831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seaside
Region: California
Posts: 8,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013mustang5.0 View Post

My friends 04 gt ran a 11.4 with full bolt ons and tires
11.4???!!! That's crazy I wonder what his mods were. I had almost every bolt on and ran a best of 13.2 on my 02 gt
__________________
)02 Gt, Founder of WE2G
Venomouz831 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 02:06 PM   #18
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013mustang5.0 View Post
My friends 04 gt ran a 11.4 with full bolt ons and tires
Absolutely did not.

An 04 with Intake, headers, pullies and tune will not run 11.4 without weight reduction. Hey MAAAAAYYYY see low 12s with a steep gear and tires
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 03:56 PM   #19
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

Absolutely did not.

An 04 with Intake, headers, pullies and tune will not run 11.4 without weight reduction. Hey MAAAAAYYYY see low 12s with a steep gear and tires
I've seen an 02 pull 11.6 in the 1/4 with full suspension and full bolt on with slicks and 4.10 gears. Full interior and pretty much perfect track conditions
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 04:01 PM   #20
Registered Member
Regular
 
Venomouz831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seaside
Region: California
Posts: 8,133
I had an 02 gt with 4.10 gears, 305 Hoosier dr, tb, plenum, intake, light cowl hood, gutted interior, light sparco seats, coil overs all around, MM k member, Bassani x pipe and borla catback, control arms and some other stuff and only got a best of 13.2
__________________
)02 Gt, Founder of WE2G
Venomouz831 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 07:39 PM   #21
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomouz831 View Post
I had an 02 gt with 4.10 gears, 305 Hoosier dr, tb, plenum, intake, light cowl hood, gutted interior, light sparco seats, coil overs all around, MM k member, Bassani x pipe and borla catback, control arms and some other stuff and only got a best of 13.2
It all depends on the track and day too. 13.2 is a good time though. There's a guy with ONLY suspension and rear seat delete running 12.9
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 07:51 PM   #22
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomouz831 View Post
I had an 02 gt with 4.10 gears, 305 Hoosier dr, tb, plenum, intake, light cowl hood, gutted interior, light sparco seats, coil overs all around, MM k member, Bassani x pipe and borla catback, control arms and some other stuff and only got a best of 13.2
It all depends on the track and day too. 13.2 is a good time though. There's a guy with ONLY suspension and rear seat delete running 12.9

---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post

It all depends on the track and day too. 13.2 is a good time though. There's a guy with ONLY suspension and rear seat delete running 12.9
Gears and stickies as well I might add
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:42 AM   #23
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
I've seen an 02 pull 11.6 in the 1/4 with full suspension and full bolt on with slicks and 4.10 gears. Full interior and pretty much perfect track conditions
60'? trap? link? Slicks are a huge overlooked mod often.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomouz831 View Post
I had an 02 gt with 4.10 gears, 305 Hoosier dr, tb, plenum, intake, light cowl hood, gutted interior, light sparco seats, coil overs all around, MM k member, Bassani x pipe and borla catback, control arms and some other stuff and only got a best of 13.2
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
It all depends on the track and day too. 13.2 is a good time though. There's a guy with ONLY suspension and rear seat delete running 12.9

---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ----------



Gears and stickies as well I might add
Suspension plays huge, so can not really call it "only" and 4.10s and slicks are very believable for a 12.9.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 01:30 PM   #24
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

60'? trap? link? Slicks are a huge overlooked mod often.

Suspension plays huge, so can not really call it "only" and 4.10s and slicks are very believable for a 12.9.
I don't have a link or any info other then the finished time and 124 mph. It was at a local strip 2 years ago
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 01:37 PM   #25
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
I don't have a link or any info other then the finished time and 124 mph. It was at a local strip 2 years ago
124 would never come from a full interior, bolt on 2V. Ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.

Bolt ons are exhaust, intake, pulleys and plenums. I suppose gears are an acceptable anomaly.

So you truly believe, that a car that has an intake, a tune, full exhaust will go from a 99-100MPH trap to a 124 MPH trap? That means the car would have to make 450-500WHP HP.

Now if he had trap say 113 or 114 with a 1.5X 60' with a 4.88 gear or something like that for an 11.99, that would be relatively possible. But the power just isn't there.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 02:26 PM   #26
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

124 would never come from a full interior, bolt on 2V. Ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.

Bolt ons are exhaust, intake, pulleys and plenums. I suppose gears are an acceptable anomaly.

So you truly believe, that a car that has an intake, a tune, full exhaust will go from a 99-100MPH trap to a 124 MPH trap? That means the car would have to make 450-500WHP HP.

Now if he had trap say 113 or 114 with a 1.5X 60' with a 4.88 gear or something like that for an 11.99, that would be relatively possible. But the power just isn't there.
Cai, udp, tb, lt headers, o/r x slp 1, port and polished pi heads on non pi block 24# injectors and a very aggressive tune, full suspension 4.10 gears and slicks. Dyno was ( I think) 293 whp and 311 wtq. He DID trap 124 in a 1/4. I have a friend who's trapping more then that in the 1/4 and he's at 380 whp.

---------- Post added at 02:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post

Cai, udp, tb, lt headers, o/r x slp 1, port and polished pi heads on non pi block 24# injectors and a very aggressive tune, full suspension 4.10 gears and slicks. Dyno was ( I think) 293 whp and 311 wtq. He DID trap 124 in a 1/4. I have a friend who's trapping more then that in the 1/4 and he's at 380 whp.
Hell I've trapped 101 in a bone stock 03 gt
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 02:30 PM   #27
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
Cai, udp, tb, lt headers, o/r x slp 1, port and polished pi heads on non pi block 24# injectors and a very aggressive tune, full suspension 4.10 gears and slicks. Dyno was ( I think) 293 whp and 311 wtq. He DID trap 124 in a 1/4. I have a friend who's trapping more then that in the 1/4 and he's at 380 whp.
Heads and block. Not bolt on. You just corroborated my point.

Dyno numbers aren't a huge deal one way or the other usually. The 293 was probably higher and even your friend may have more than that.

380 WHP is also very difficult to reach 124, let alone "higher" on a 4.10.

You saying it doesn't prove it. You could search youtube all day and be lucky to find one pull this off. 3V Mustang which make more power mod for mod can barely pull this off.

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:29 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
Cai, udp, tb, lt headers, o/r x slp 1, port and polished pi heads on non pi block 24# injectors and a very aggressive tune, full suspension 4.10 gears and slicks. Dyno was ( I think) 293 whp and 311 wtq. He DID trap 124 in a 1/4. I have a friend who's trapping more then that in the 1/4 and he's at 380 whp.

---------- Post added at 02:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------



Hell I've trapped 101 in a bone stock 03 gt
I said a bone stock one would trap around 100MPH. That isn't in dispute here.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 03:20 PM   #28
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

Heads and block. Not bolt on. You just corroborated my point.

Dyno numbers aren't a huge deal one way or the other usually. The 293 was probably higher and even your friend may have more than that.

380 WHP is also very difficult to reach 124, let alone "higher" on a 4.10.

You saying it doesn't prove it. You could search youtube all day and be lucky to find one pull this off. 3V Mustang which make more power mod for mod can barely pull this off.

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:29 PM ----------



I said a bone stock one would trap around 100MPH. That isn't in dispute here.
Ok know it all. I know what I saw and what's possible. I wouldn't come on here and spew bs when I have no reason to. I take it you have a tough time pulling a good mph?
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 03:32 PM   #29
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

Heads and block. Not bolt on. You just corroborated my point.

Dyno numbers aren't a huge deal one way or the other usually. The 293 was probably higher and even your friend may have more than that.

380 WHP is also very difficult to reach 124, let alone "higher" on a 4.10.

You saying it doesn't prove it. You could search youtube all day and be lucky to find one pull this off. 3V Mustang which make more power mod for mod can barely pull this off.

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:29 PM ----------



I said a bone stock one would trap around 100MPH. That isn't in dispute here.
An 06 ls3 vette stock with slicks ran an 11.8 at 127 at my local track Friday... It's doesn't take 500 whp to reach that trap speed in a 1/4.
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 12:14 AM   #30
Registered Member
Regular
 
MATT.TURBO_S197's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: alexandria
Region: Louisiana
Posts: 24
A vette is a super car...power 2 weight in those are crazy.....
MATT.TURBO_S197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 07:17 AM   #31
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
An 06 ls3 vette stock with slicks ran an 11.8 at 127 at my local track Friday... It's doesn't take 500 whp to reach that trap speed in a 1/4.
A vette is LIGHTER, better gearing, and more aero dynamic. Additionally, the Vette also will not hit 127 MPH on only slicks. Will not happen. Additionally, we are not talking about a Vette, but that being said, an LS3 C6 Vette will not hit 127.

127 is a 10 second time on slicks. If at 127, he only got a 11.8, then he did not get a good launch on the slicks, which would negate the gains had by a slick, which by the way, is not going to make a car faster, it will just shorten it's time in the 1/8th, allowing for a better 1/4.

We can go on all day, it is not happening.

---------- Post added at 08:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:15 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
Ok know it all. I know what I saw and what's possible. I wouldn't come on here and spew bs when I have no reason to. I take it you have a tough time pulling a good mph?
You can call it whatever you like, sir. Facts are facts that you can not refute. Find a few examples of said achievements.

For the benefit of the doubt, I googled for you and couldn't find ONE example close.

A Stock C6 traps between 114-116. It is not gaining 11 MPH on slicks.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:11 AM   #32
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

A vette is LIGHTER, better gearing, and more aero dynamic. Additionally, the Vette also will not hit 127 MPH on only slicks. Will not happen. Additionally, we are not talking about a Vette, but that being said, an LS3 C6 Vette will not hit 127.

127 is a 10 second time on slicks. If at 127, he only got a 11.8, then he did not get a good launch on the slicks, which would negate the gains had by a slick, which by the way, is not going to make a car faster, it will just shorten it's time in the 1/8th, allowing for a better 1/4.

We can go on all day, it is not happening.

---------- Post added at 08:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:15 AM ----------



You can call it whatever you like, sir. Facts are facts that you can not refute. Find a few examples of said achievements.

For the benefit of the doubt, I googled for you and couldn't find ONE example close.

A Stock C6 traps between 114-116. It is not gaining 11 MPH on slicks.
Lol my bad his trap was 126 and he ran an 11.83. He obviously didn't get a good launch. I'll record him next time he's there for your "proof". As a matter of fact a buddy already recorded him. And I'm sorry he isn't bone stock, he's straight piped with slicks. I do agree however 126 is 10 second territory, but not everyone can get a good launch I guess. I'm telling you I know what I saw and I as well can go all day
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:31 AM   #33
Registered Member
Regular
 
DaBluedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Region: Canada
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post

Cai, udp, tb, lt headers, o/r x slp 1, port and polished pi heads on non pi block 24# injectors and a very aggressive tune, full suspension 4.10 gears and slicks. Dyno was ( I think) 293 whp and 311 wtq. He DID trap 124 in a 1/4. I have a friend who's trapping more then that in the 1/4 and he's at 380 whp.

---------- Post added at 02:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------

Hell I've trapped 101 in a bone stock 03 gt
Sorry man, no chance a 33xxlb car putting down 300 rwhp even on a perfect day hits that kind of trap speed. It just isn't possible. It doesn't make enough power to get to that speed. My mach 1 with similar power and good power shifts will not break more than 115 sea level (108 at altitude so I'm guessing a little more in thick air). I could maybe see a mid 12 with the gears and slicks. But no way an 11.
__________________
2003 Mach 1
DaBluedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:35 AM   #34
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by White03GT View Post
Lol my bad his trap was 126 and he ran an 11.83. He obviously didn't get a good launch. I'll record him next time he's there for your "proof". As a matter of fact a buddy already recorded him. And I'm sorry he isn't bone stock, he's straight piped with slicks. I do agree however 126 is 10 second territory, but not everyone can get a good launch I guess. I'm telling you I know what I saw and I as well can go all day
What I am saying is 126 MPH will not come from slicks. Period.

I am not asking you for proof that they went 126 or 124 MPH, I am telling you that if they did, they certainly did not do it under the circumstances you've stated. Not Possible.

As for your vid, that is a vid, with no description of a Vette running 11.82. Doesn't exactly sustain your claim. It is ok, though. With all due respect, keep on dreaming.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:47 AM   #35
Registered Member
Regular
 
White03GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hereford
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

What I am saying is 126 MPH will not come from slicks. Period.

I am not asking you for proof that they went 126 or 124 MPH, I am telling you that if they did, they certainly did not do it under the circumstances you've stated. Not Possible.

As for your vid, that is a vid, with no description of a Vette running 11.82. Doesn't exactly sustain your claim. It is ok, though. With all due respect, keep on dreaming.
Lol ok ill post another vid of a complete walk around and under the hood of his car next time I see him. It's ok though I understand why you're having a hard time believing . There is also a full weight, radio, ac and all street legal 2v running high 8s in the 1/4 at 793 whp and 827 wtq... You going to claim I'm full of **** on that too?
White03GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 2005-2010 Mustang GT

Tags
2005 mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


» Like Us On Facebook



01:31 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.