Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator? - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > Classic Mustangs



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 08-22-2009, 03:30 AM   #1
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 35
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

I have a 1965 Mustang GT. Would like to put a new higher erformance carb on. Which one would you recommend and the model of the carburator. Thanks...
archibald is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-22-2009, 04:10 AM   #2
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

Actually in an old Hot Rod magazine they once did a comparison. They were rather suprised that a stock Autolite 4100 actually outperformed a Holley 600 and an Edelbrock in informal testing. The 4100 was one of Ford's better designs. Pony Carburetors is a company that specializes in rebuilding and restoring old carburetors. They hold VERY high opinions of the 4100. You may already have the carb you're wanting, it's just showing its age and in need of maintenance.
I have a 4100 on my wife's car. Basically because I had one laying around when I needed it. We like it just fine. She says it gets better mileage than the stock Ford/Holley it replaced. No real numbers though. It does seem very responsive to me and definitely fun to drive.
I have an Edelbrock on my rather modified Ford truck. It does the job and is quite reliable. The truck is seldom driven lately but is ready to go whenever. Edelbrocks are better about being left to sit for long periods than Holleys and need much less attention in general. I like to use my truck, not fiddle with it. It's just an old truck really, not much too look at and got a few problems. But being slow is NOT one of the problems. : )
I have a Holley on my very modified Mustang. Basically because the Holley is highly tunable and is a better match to what other stuff I've done to the car. I don't need my Mustang to drive every day, it's a weekend car. I take pleasure with fiddling with it. Holleys respond very well to regular attention. Mostly.
So as an owner of all three, I'll boil it down.
4100's are hard to find. When you find one it'll be pretty darn old, Ford quit making them a long time ago. And as such, you shouldn't expect much out of it until it has been rebuilt to optimal condition. But in good shape, one is very hard to beat on a stock to mild 289/302/5.0. The "small" 4100's are rated at 480cfm, pretty much an ideal match for a mild Ford small block.
A bit cheaper and easier to deal with is an Edelbrock. If nothing else, they are very reliable. Many folks just bolt one on and go with no trouble. You can tune them to your needs though. An Edelbrock 500cfm is pretty close to ideal for a mildly modified 289/302 engine. If you plan on doing a LOT more engine upgrades, you might want a 600cfm version.
If you don't mind tuning one regularly and want all-out performance a Holley is about the best way to go. The usual Holley starts at 600cfm, really too big for a stock engine. I understand the "Street Avenger" series come smaller. One of those would likely be a better choice. Folks that run 600cfm Holleys often are found complaing about the carbs being difficult to tune to their engines. "Stumbling" upon take off is a VERY common complaint and not always easy to fix.
There are many Ford and Mustang forums out there. I suggest browsing a few and seeing what other folks have had luck with. I believe you'll find a lot of folks have had about the same experiences as me. There are folks that will swear a particular carb is the "be all end all" and all others stink. I tend to ignore those types myself. Which one will best suit you and your car is up to you.
armond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 04:42 AM   #3
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 42
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

I concur with Gypsy R--the Autolite 4100 was actually designed by Holley engineers for OEM use at Ford Motor Company (I suspect that Nash, eventually part of AMC, and International Harvester also used it); Holley has kept the drive alive with the 4010 and 4015 carburetors. The 4150, 4160, 4165, and 4175 were designed with racers in mind, with fully modular fuel metering. I tend to recommend the 4100 for safety reasons, as the fuel bowls are integrally cast into the main body rather than bolted on; the 4150 is more tunable for off-highway apps, as air bleeds and channel restrictions are more tool-accessible than the 4000/4100.

The Edelbrock is a completely different design, using needle valves on the main jets; the Rochester 4M and M4M carburetors are close relatives.

All these manufacturers fine-tune these carbs on their factory flow benches to get them to a tight mixture specification over a huge range of mass airflow. The 4100's my vote in your case.
wylingford is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-22-2009, 05:39 AM   #4
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 45
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

I'd go with the most simplistic carb for reliability and easy of adjustment for the street, Edelbrock.
And unless you have a high comp. motor stay with a 550cfm
single pump.

Holley carbs are great for strip racing because they many ways they be adjusted, from jets,squirter to pump cams,But getting the right comb will make your hair fall out. Trust me on that one.

HOBBY CARS SHOULD BE FUN, not headaches.
Good luck in your choice.
twain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 06:10 AM   #5
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 40
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

Both are good carbs, but I prefer the holley.On a stock or mild engine a 600cfm carb would be about right.
imported_cleve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 06:58 AM   #6
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 37
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

WOW! That was a bunch of good info! Look, put on whichever looks best to you (500 to 600 cfm depending on what has been done) then tune it to the MANUFACTURER'S SPECS! They DO need adjustment right out of the box. Trust me, I tuned my Edelbrock using the mfr instructions and it works a WHOLE LOT BETTER than it did doing the "bigger is better" tuning attitude!!

Good luck
bernardas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 07:53 AM   #7
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

the edelbrock is probably a better unit out of the box..however both are very close to each other..
kolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 08:46 AM   #8
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

I have a 70 vert with 351 cleve in it. I had a Holly 650 but they leak alot due to all the gaskets; I swapped it for a chome Edlebrock 650 with only one gasket but the bowl sits right on my air cooled intake so it cooks the gas, after I put a heat riser plate under the carb and retuned it, I have had no problems with it. Its 50-50 and really personal preference....
akins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 08:55 AM   #9
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 40
Edelbrock vs Holly Carburator?

Id go the holley as they are cheaper for parts and rebuild and go for a 650 / 750 holley double pumper on the 302w/351w as there will be a power increase with out going overboard on fuel consumption
cheng-gong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > Classic Mustangs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


» Like Us On Facebook



01:16 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.