Why gas prices are so high !!!!! - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 1996-2004 Mustang GT

Join Mustang Evolution Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 06-10-2008, 01:39 PM   #1
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Region: Texas
Posts: 17
Exclamation Why gas prices are so high !!!!!

May 21, 2008
> Earlier today, the Senate Judiciary Committee summoned top
> executives from the petroleum industry for what Chairman Pat
> Leahy thought would be a politically profitable inquisition.
> Leahy and his comrades showed up ready to blame American oil
> companies for the high price of gasoline, but the event wasn't
> as satisfactory as the Democrats had hoped.
> The industry lineup was formidable:
> • Robert Malone, Chairman and President of BP America, Inc.;
> • John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Company;
> • Peter Robertson, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chevron
> Corporation;
> • John Lowe, Executive Vice President, Conoco Philips Company;
> and
> • Stephen Simon, Senior Vice President, Exxon Mobil
> Corporation.
> Not surprisingly, the petroleum executives stole the show, as
> they were far smarter, infinitely better informed, and much
> more public-spirited than the Senate Democrats.
> One theme that emerged from the hearing was the surprisingly
> small role played by American oil companies in the global
> petroleum market.
> John Lowe pointed out:
> I cannot overemphasize the access issue. Access to resources is
> severely restricted in the United States and abroad, and the
> American oil industry must compete with national oil companies
> who are often much larger and have the support of their
> governments.
> We can only compete directly for 7 percent of the world's
> available reserves while about 75 percent is completely
> controlled by national oil companies and is not accessible.
> Stephen Simon amplified:
> Exxon Mobil is the largest U.S. oil and gas company, but we
> account for only 2 percent of global energy production, only 3
> percent of global oil production, only 6 percent of global
> refining capacity, and only 1 percent of global petroleum
> reserves. With respect to petroleum reserves, we rank 14th.
> Government-owned national oil companies dominate the top spots.
> For an American company to succeed in this competitive
> landscape and go head to head with huge government-backed
> national oil companies, it needs financial strength and scale
> to execute massive complex energy projects requiring enormous
> long-term investments.
> To simply maintain our current operations and make needed
> capital investments, Exxon Mobil spends nearly $1 billion each
> day.
> Because foreign companies and governments control the
> overwhelming majority of the world's oil, most of the price you
> pay at the pump is the cost paid by the American oil company to
> acquire crude oil from someone else.
> Last year, the average price in the United States of a gallon
> of regular unleaded gasoline was around $2.80. On average in
> 2007, approximately 58 percent of the price reflected the
> amount paid for crude oil. Consumers pay for that crude oil,
> and so do we.
> Of the 2 million barrels per day Exxon Mobil refined in 2007
> here in the United States, 90 percent were purchased from
> others.
> Another theme of the day's testimony was that, if anyone is
> "gouging" consumers through the high price of gasoline, it is
> federal and state governments, not American oil companies. On
> the average, 15% percent of the cost of gasoline at the pump
> goes for taxes, while only 4% represents oil company profits.
> These figures were repeated several times, but, strangely, not
> a single Democratic Senator proposed relieving consumers'
> anxieties about gas prices by reducing taxes.
> The last theme that was sounded repeatedly was Congress's
> responsibility for the fact that American companies have access
> to so little petroleum.
> Shell's John Hofmeister explained, eloquently:
> While all oil-importing nations buy oil at global prices, some,
> notably India and China, subsidize the cost of oil products to
> their nation's consumers, feeding the demand for more oil
> despite record prices. They do this to speed economic growth
> and to ensure a competitive advantage relative to other
> nations.
> Meanwhile, in the United States, access to our own oil and gas
> resources has been limited for the last 30 years, prohibiting
> companies such as Shell from exploring and developing resources
> for the benefit of the American people.
> Senator Sessions, I agree, it is not a free market.
> According to the Department of the Interior, 62 percent of all
> on-shore federal lands are off limits to oil and gas
> developments, with restrictions applying to 92 percent of all
> federal lands. We have an outer continental shelf moratorium on
> the Atlantic Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on
> the Pacific Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on the
> eastern Gulf of Mexico, congressional bans on on-shore oil and
> gas activities in specific areas of the Rockies and Alaska, and
> even a congressional ban on doing an analysis of the resource
> potential for oil and gas in the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern
> Gulf of Mexico.
> The Argonne National Laboratory did a report in 2004 that
> identified 40 specific federal policy areas that halt, limit,
> delay or restrict natural gas projects. I urge you to review
> it. It is a long list. If I may, I offer it today if you would
> like to include it in the record.
> When many of these policies were implemented, oil was selling
> in the single digits, not the triple digits we see now. The
> cumulative effect of these policies has been to discourage U.S.
> investment and send U.S. companies outside the United States to
> produce new supplies.
> As a result, U.S. production has declined so much that nearly
> 60 percent of daily consumption comes from foreign sources.
> The problem of access can be solved in this country by the same
> government that has prohibited it. Congress could have chosen
> to lift some or all of the current restrictions on exploration
> and production of oil and gas. Congress could provide national
> policy to reverse the persistent decline of domestically secure
> natural resource development.
> Later in the hearing, Senator Orrin Hatch walked Hofmeister
> through the Democrats' latest efforts to block energy
> independence:
> HATCH: I want to get into that. In other words, we're talking
> about Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. It's fair to say that they're
> not considered part of America's $22 billion of proven
> reserves.
> HOFMEISTER: Not at all.
> HATCH: No, but experts agree that there's between 800 billion
> to almost 2 trillion barrels of oil that could be recoverable
> there, and that's good oil, isn't it?
> HOFMEISTER: That's correct.
> HATCH: It could be recovered at somewhere between $30 and $40 a
> barrel?
> HOFMEISTER: I think those costs are probably a bit dated now,
> based upon what we've seen in the inflation...
> HATCH: Well, somewhere in that area.
> HOFMEISTER: I don't know what the exact cost would be, but, you
> know, if there is more supply, I think inflation in the oil
> industry would be cracked. And we are facing severe inflation
> because of the limited amount of supply against the demand.
> HATCH: I guess what I'm saying, though, is that if we started
> to develop the oil shale in those three states we could do it
> within this framework of over $100 a barrel and make a profit.
> HOFMEISTER: I believe we could.
> HATCH: And we could help our country alleviate its oil
> pressures.
> HATCH: But they're stopping us from doing that right here, as
> we sit here. We just had a hearing last week where Democrats
> had stopped the ability to do that, in at least Colorado.
> HOFMEISTER: Well, as I said in my opening statement, I think
> the public policy constraints on the supply side in this
> country are a disservice to the American consumer.
> The committee's Democrats attempted no response. They know that
> they are largely responsible for the current high price of
> gasoline, and they want the price to rise even further.
> Consequently, they have no intention of permitting the
> development of domestic oil and gas reserves that would both
> increase this country's energy independence and give consumers
> a break from constantly increasing energy costs.
> Every once in a while, Congressional hearings turn out to be
> informative.
captainsteve57 is offline   Reply With Quote

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 1996-2004 Mustang GT

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Gas Prices Danger Dude The Bar 24 08-29-2006 04:23 PM
gas prices... midnightmustang The Bar 22 08-23-2004 05:50 PM
Gas Prices!!! Stang01 The Bar 30 06-24-2004 01:05 PM
Gas Prices Ken The Bar 5 05-18-2004 01:56 PM
Gas prices 01mineralgrey6 The Bar 32 05-17-2004 07:03 PM

» Like Us On Facebook

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

07:22 AM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.