Fastest stock mustang. - Page 3 - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > Ford Mustang | Wrenching, Care and General Topics > General Mustang Discussion



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 04-08-2013, 03:09 PM   #71
Registered Member
Regular
 
gladiatoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kelowna BC
Region: Canada
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post
+1
+1

---------- Post added at 01:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:06 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post
A V6 Mustang is no where near 4000 lbs.

3401 lbs for a manual.


My Mustang only weights 3490 lb , and it's a 2005 GT auto , the newer GT's are heavier now due to more safety regulations etc... they seem to get heavier each year wonder what the 2015 GT will weight ????
gladiatoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-08-2013, 03:11 PM   #72
ME Bloodhound
Staff
 
Soccerluvr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento/Bay Area
Region: California
Posts: 14,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekJohnScott View Post
This could be quite the read...
Keeps me entertained during class lol. Now off to the FWD vs RWD thread to keep me occupied also lol
__________________

Bullitt build paused pending graduation

HID end all thread
Soccerluvr4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 06:04 PM   #73
Registered Member
Regular
 
UltArc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Region: Ohio
Posts: 1,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz

Roush isn't stock. Roush is multiple addons and modifications from a company. The GT500 is a 100% stock, you can order it just like all the other mustangs strait from Ford. I consider stock as what Ford offers as an option for the car, direct from them. No third party.
Its fair to say the Roush isnt stock, but Roush does develop the GT500, and the Stage 3 takes the GT500 on the drag and track.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billymich

So that future generations will be able to reap our wisdom
I literally laughed out loud from this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnight2012

There are a lot more V6's sold than GTs so doesn't that value also make them the most popular?
But, if you asked someone which 2014 Mustang they would prefer for free? I bet the majority would say GT500. Not arguing, just another point of view.

Like, whats more popular? A Gallardo or civic? More peope have civics, but the Gallardo is more popular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii

Since the beginning of time (sarcasm) the lower models sell wayyy more than the better or more desirable model. Without V6 sales there would be NO GT. Without Ralliart sales, there would be no EVO etc.
Isn't the Ralliart the weird estate model? Like the old Malibu Maxx?

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangRick65

I beg to differ and if you compare the prices of top of the line cars back then to what people pay for a v6 now a days it's a huge difference even if you were to compare what a dollar was worth back then to now your v6 mustang weighs what 4000 pounds with all it's plastic and stuff idk anything about new mustangs I just know they are complicated weigh alot and are over priced
3400. A lot. The most price efficient and power efficient front rear on the market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz

That's not true at all. The conversion rate is almost exact. The first mustang was about $3400 in 1964. That is equal to about $25000 in today's money. The price of a base v6. The higher charges are all electronic now. Which wasn't available in the 60's
Hmm. Mine was 22,600 before A plan, or rebates. So, a 201x is cheaper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangRick65

On top of everything for my last post the hipo mustangs run probably high 13s and befor 67 they didn't really offer cars for "racing" now adays they put prochargers and turbos on every other car outta the door in my opinion also you can't really do much with the new motors i mean tell me man when ur car blows up or you throw a rocker Im sure ur not gunna tear that son of a gun apart and fix it ur gunna go get it fixed by ford not very many people know what's goin on under there if I threw a rocker I could fix it in two minutes I've done it befor but I'm just saying compare everything from old to new not just speed I can put the 35,000 in my car and whoop u down the track and with ur 35,000 u only have enough to buy the new v6 an maybe make it to the track run it and get it home on the cash you have left
After the first three rows, and no periods, I stopped reading.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii

A V6 Mustang is no where near 4000 lbs.

3401 lbs for a manual.
+1

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangRick65

Generous ? Ha I have a carb and cam on my car no internal work I've probably got 1000 dollars under the hood and my car ran a 13.45 and my comment about engines now a days has to do with it all being electro ur car has its own mind mines like a double A battery compared to ur computer....
Video of that 13.45?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii

Wow, just getting better and better.

You have a cam but NO internal work?

Your comment also does not even apply to your reply of my comment. You using a modded cars time to validate that same car's stock time is like comparing apples to books. Or Batteries to computers. Seriously, you're 17. No matter what you think, you have so much to learn and it is bleeding through comment after comment.
+1

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangRick65

Ok guys maybe ur v6 could beat a stock 289 hipo I've never driven one (v6) idk but I have my opinions you have urs in my opinion older cars are much simpler and get cheaper power an they are what I know I've been tearin em down and rebuilden em with my dad since I was little so maybe my opinion is effected by that but any day 80% of Americans would pick a classic over a new v6 looks and all an that's why you see so many built old mustangs here in Ohio
80% of Americans? 80% of NORTH AMERICA, US and Canada, don't know how to drive standard. Which most classics are. I am not sure about central and south America. 80% of North Americans don't care about cars. They buy something cute, they can afford, or at the first dealership they went to. People may like older cars, but after they drove in it for an hour-they'd be craving modern technology. Like seat cushions from this millennia, air con/heat, ride quality, any of the other things that have advanced in the last forty years.
__________________
2012 Mustang EPA: 19/29
2012 AeroStang: 40/46

My sponsor, Tokkyo Nutrition, offers 50% off your entire order with the code "PowerHouse"
UltArc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-08-2013, 06:33 PM   #74
Registered Member
Regular
 
mrkrabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
Its fair to say the Roush isnt stock, but Roush does develop the GT500, and the Stage 3 takes the GT500 on the drag and track.



I literally laughed out loud from this.



But, if you asked someone which 2014 Mustang they would prefer for free? I bet the majority would say GT500. Not arguing, just another point of view.

Like, whats more popular? A Gallardo or civic? More peope have civics, but the Gallardo is more popular.



Isn't the Ralliart the weird estate model? Like the old Malibu Maxx?



3400. A lot. The most price efficient and power efficient front rear on the market.



Hmm. Mine was 22,600 before A plan, or rebates. So, a 201x is cheaper.



After the first three rows, and no periods, I stopped reading.



+1



Video of that 13.45?



+1



80% of Americans? 80% of NORTH AMERICA, US and Canada, don't know how to drive standard. Which most classics are. I am not sure about central and south America. 80% of North Americans don't care about cars. They buy something cute, they can afford, or at the first dealership they went to. People may like older cars, but after they drove in it for an hour-they'd be craving modern technology. Like seat cushions from this millennia, air con/heat, ride quality, any of the other things that have advanced in the last forty years.


*ahem* Drumroll.............*Facepalm*

I'm not even going to bother with the 15 minutes it'll take me to correct that entire post... so i'll just leave it at this..
mrkrabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:26 PM   #75
Registered Member
Regular
 
UltArc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Region: Ohio
Posts: 1,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz

*ahem* Drumroll.............*Facepalm*

I'm not even going to bother with the 15 minutes it'll take me to correct that entire post... so i'll just leave it at this..
? You are welcome to CORRECT what you think is wrong.
__________________
2012 Mustang EPA: 19/29
2012 AeroStang: 40/46

My sponsor, Tokkyo Nutrition, offers 50% off your entire order with the code "PowerHouse"
UltArc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:34 PM   #76
ME Bloodhound
Staff
 
Soccerluvr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento/Bay Area
Region: California
Posts: 14,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post

? You are welcome to CORRECT what you think is wrong.
I agree, most Americans don't know how to drive standard. I know a few people that don't even know what a manual is, they just say "what's a manual? Is it that thing with the lever you move while driving?"
__________________

Bullitt build paused pending graduation

HID end all thread
Soccerluvr4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:34 PM   #77
Registered Member
Regular
 
mrkrabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
? You are welcome to CORRECT what you think is wrong.
I know i'm welcomed to correct you, I just don't see the point in going back and forth for another 50+ posts. This thread is already taking up way to much time, is way off topic, and i'm out of popcorn!
mrkrabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2013, 07:39 PM   #78
Registered Member
Regular
 
UltArc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Region: Ohio
Posts: 1,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soccerluvr4

I agree, most Americans don't know how to drive standard. I know a few people that don't even know what a manual is, they just say "what's a manual? Is it that thing with the lever you move while driving?"
Lol, yepp. It's becoming a lost art.
__________________
2012 Mustang EPA: 19/29
2012 AeroStang: 40/46

My sponsor, Tokkyo Nutrition, offers 50% off your entire order with the code "PowerHouse"
UltArc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 01:03 AM   #79
Registered Member
Regular
 
Midnight2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: So Cal
Region: California
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post

I know i'm welcomed to correct you, I just don't see the point in going back and forth for another 50+ posts. This thread is already taking up way to much time, is way off topic, and i'm out of popcorn!
2003 Mustang Mach 1 Vortech. 1/4 mile: 12.0 sec @ 121.2 mph 0-60: 3.9 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT500 KR. 1/4 mile: 12.4 sec @ 118.1 mph 0-60: 4.1 sec.

2007 Ford Shelby GT500. 1/4 mile: 12.7 sec @ 114.2 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra. 1/4 mile: 12.8 sec @ 113.2 mph 0-60: 4.7 sec.

1998 Saleen S351. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 116.8 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2008 Dan Gurney Signature Edition Mustang. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 111.3 mph 0-60: 4.3 sec.

2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.8 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec

2008 Racecraft 420 S. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT SC. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 110.2 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2006 ROUSH Stage 3 Mustang. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 109.7 mph 0-60: 4.5 sec.

Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/ten-of-the...#ixzz2PwXxkCnM
Follow us: @MotorTrend on Twitter | MotortrendMag on Facebook

THE 2013 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT 500
Engine: 5.9-liter V8
Max. power: 650 hp
0-60 time: 4 seconds
Top speed: 202 mph

Oh and without a doubt the fastest stock Mustang V6 ever.
2011-2014 3.7
Midnight2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 02:00 AM   #80
Registered Member
Regular
 
mrkrabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnight2012 View Post
2003 Mustang Mach 1 Vortech. 1/4 mile: 12.0 sec @ 121.2 mph 0-60: 3.9 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT500 KR. 1/4 mile: 12.4 sec @ 118.1 mph 0-60: 4.1 sec.

2007 Ford Shelby GT500. 1/4 mile: 12.7 sec @ 114.2 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra. 1/4 mile: 12.8 sec @ 113.2 mph 0-60: 4.7 sec.

1998 Saleen S351. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 116.8 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2008 Dan Gurney Signature Edition Mustang. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 111.3 mph 0-60: 4.3 sec.

2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.8 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec

2008 Racecraft 420 S. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT SC. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 110.2 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2006 ROUSH Stage 3 Mustang. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 109.7 mph 0-60: 4.5 sec.

Read more: Ten of the Fastest Ford Mustangs Motor Trend Has Tested - WOT on Motor Trend
Follow us: @MotorTrend on Twitter | MotortrendMag on Facebook

THE 2013 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT 500
Engine: 5.9-liter V8
Max. power: 650 hp
0-60 time: 4 seconds
Top speed: 202 mph

Oh and without a doubt the fastest stock Mustang V6 ever.
2011-2014 3.7
Not sure why you're quoting me in this....
mrkrabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 02:14 AM   #81
Registered Member
Regular
 
Michaelgranlund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Rocklin
Region: California
Posts: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBluedude View Post

We're starting to run low on popcorn anyways.
Hahahahahahaha idk why but that's the funniest post I've seen on this site
Michaelgranlund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 06:43 AM   #82
Registered Member
Regular
 
gladiatoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kelowna BC
Region: Canada
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
Its fair to say the Roush isnt stock, but Roush does develop the GT500, and the Stage 3 takes the GT500 on the drag and track.



I literally laughed out loud from this.



But, if you asked someone which 2014 Mustang they would prefer for free? I bet the majority would say GT500. Not arguing, just another point of view.

Like, whats more popular? A Gallardo or civic? More peope have civics, but the Gallardo is more popular.



Isn't the Ralliart the weird estate model? Like the old Malibu Maxx?



3400. A lot. The most price efficient and power efficient front rear on the market.



Hmm. Mine was 22,600 before A plan, or rebates. So, a 201x is cheaper.



After the first three rows, and no periods, I stopped reading.



+1



Video of that 13.45?



+1



80% of Americans? 80% of NORTH AMERICA, US and Canada, don't know how to drive standard. Which most classics are. I am not sure about central and south America. 80% of North Americans don't care about cars. They buy something cute, they can afford, or at the first dealership they went to. People may like older cars, but after they drove in it for an hour-they'd be craving modern technology. Like seat cushions from this millennia, air con/heat, ride quality, any of the other things that have advanced in the last forty years.
gladiatoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:31 AM   #83
Registered Member
Regular
 
Midnight2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: So Cal
Region: California
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post

Not sure why you're quoting me in this....
You said the thread was off topic so I put it on topic.
Midnight2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 05:38 PM   #84
Registered Member
Regular
 
shsfresh87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Region: West Virgina
Posts: 814
Nom nom nom, (mouth full of popcorn)
shsfresh87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 05:45 PM   #85
Registered Member
Regular
 
mrkrabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by shsfresh87 View Post
Nom nom nom, (mouth full of popcorn)
I thought we were out! Pass it over!
mrkrabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 06:13 PM   #86
Registered Member
Regular
 
shsfresh87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Region: West Virgina
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post

I thought we were out! Pass it over!
Here ya go. Pass the pop.
shsfresh87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 06:34 PM   #87
Registered Member
Regular
 
2300turboford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: london
Region: Kentucky
Posts: 2,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post

I thought we were out! Pass it over!
Save some for me lol
__________________
"Racing is life ,anything before or after is just waiting "-the king of cool -Steve McQueen
2300turboford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 07:03 PM   #88
Registered Member
Regular
 
shsfresh87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Region: West Virgina
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2300turboford View Post

Save some for me lol
Ok, do you like Dr. Pepper?
shsfresh87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 07:30 PM   #89
Registered Member
Regular
 
madGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Chester County
Region: Pennsylvania
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by shsfresh87 View Post

Ok, do you like Dr. Pepper?
Mr Pibb is waay better. LOL.
madGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 07:45 PM   #90
Registered Member
Regular
 
2300turboford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: london
Region: Kentucky
Posts: 2,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by shsfresh87 View Post

Ok, do you like Dr. Pepper?
Love it!!!
__________________
"Racing is life ,anything before or after is just waiting "-the king of cool -Steve McQueen
2300turboford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:56 AM   #91
Registered Member
Regular
 
fbakersc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: chapin
Region: South Carolina
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnight2012 View Post

2003 Mustang Mach 1 Vortech. 1/4 mile: 12.0 sec @ 121.2 mph 0-60: 3.9 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT500 KR. 1/4 mile: 12.4 sec @ 118.1 mph 0-60: 4.1 sec.

2007 Ford Shelby GT500. 1/4 mile: 12.7 sec @ 114.2 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra. 1/4 mile: 12.8 sec @ 113.2 mph 0-60: 4.7 sec.

1998 Saleen S351. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 116.8 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2008 Dan Gurney Signature Edition Mustang. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 111.3 mph 0-60: 4.3 sec.

2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.8 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec

2008 Racecraft 420 S. 1/4 mile: 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph 0-60: 4.4 sec.

2008 Ford Shelby GT SC. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 110.2 mph 0-60: 4.6 sec.

2006 ROUSH Stage 3 Mustang. 1/4 mile: 13.0 sec @ 109.7 mph 0-60: 4.5 sec.

Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/ten-of-the...#ixzz2PwXxkCnM
Follow us: @MotorTrend on Twitter | MotortrendMag on Facebook

THE 2013 FORD MUSTANG SHELBY GT 500
Engine: 5.9-liter V8
Max. power: 650 hp
0-60 time: 4 seconds
Top speed: 202 mph

Oh and without a doubt the fastest stock Mustang V6 ever.
2011-2014 3.7
incorrect info above on the 13 gt500....its a 5.8 liter...listed HP is 662. Dyno on mine bone stock was 600 rwhp. 0-60 in 3 secs. Haven't got 1/4 mile numbers now but will post when I do. Just defending the most powerful v8 engine ever built!
fbakersc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 07:27 AM   #92
Registered Member
Regular
 
gladiatoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kelowna BC
Region: Canada
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbakersc View Post
incorrect info above on the 13 gt500....its a 5.8 liter...listed HP is 662. Dyno on mine bone stock was 600 rwhp. 0-60 in 3 secs. Haven't got 1/4 mile numbers now but will post when I do. Just defending the most powerful v8 engine ever built!
0 to 60 in 3 seconds flat WOW that's amazing. So it would be faster than the Corvette ZR1 which is listed as 3.4 time.
gladiatoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 07:28 AM   #93
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladiatoro View Post
0 to 60 in 3 seconds flat WOW that's amazing. So it would be faster than the Corvette ZR1 which is listed as 3.4 time.
The ZR1 has seen 10s in 100 % stock trim.

The GT500 hasn't but is not far behind at all.

The times listed for cars are generally worse than what they can actually do since mag writers often do not have much time to drive the car.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 07:32 AM   #94
Registered Member
Regular
 
fbakersc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: chapin
Region: South Carolina
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladiatoro View Post

0 to 60 in 3 seconds flat WOW that's amazing. So it would be faster than the Corvette ZR1 which is listed as 3.4 time.
Got a little excited...stock numbers are showing 3.7 from the testers I think...mine isnt quite stock anymore. Just raced a ZR1 last weekend 0-100 or so several times...we were pretty much even. Lot to do with driver too as you know.
fbakersc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 07:39 AM   #95
Registered Member
Regular
 
garbill2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Region: Pennsylvania
Posts: 914
Super snake
garbill2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 08:52 AM   #96
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Welll fastest stock one that the public can buy may would be the cobra jet? Cause they are sold that way so technically they are stock.. But they also make a Boss 302S which is faster track car while the cobra jet it drag.. But you cant own a Boss 302S cant be owned without a racing license
Heres the Boss 302S and we all know what a cobra jet looks like..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1847910972.png
Views:	77
Size:	710.1 KB
ID:	101743  
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 08:53 AM   #97
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

The ZR1 has seen 10s in 100 % stock trim.

The GT500 hasn't but is not far behind at all.

The times listed for cars are generally worse than what they can actually do since mag writers often do not have much time to drive the car.
Heres a race between the too

http://youtu.be/5Q0Y2ay5nhw
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 09:05 AM   #98
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99mustang99 View Post
Welll fastest stock one that the public can buy may would be the cobra jet? Cause they are sold that way so technically they are stock.. But they also make a Boss 302S which is faster track car while the cobra jet it drag.. But you cant own a Boss 302S cant be owned without a racing license
Heres the Boss 302S and we all know what a cobra jet looks like..
Cobra jet is a track car from the gate, like not streetable I believe.
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 09:10 AM   #99
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

Cobra jet is a track car from the gate, like not streetable I believe.
Still a stock car sold technically tho? Even tho its not practical for street use
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 09:15 AM   #100
Registered Member
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lakeland
Region: Florida
Posts: 1,699
Send a message via AIM to Borii
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99mustang99 View Post
Still a stock car sold technically tho? Even tho its not practical for street use
I suppose since there were no specifics listed in the original post it is all fair game
__________________
SOLD - 06 GT 371WHP/332WTQ


Sold - 1998 Camaro SS
Sold - 2001 Audi S4
Borii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 09:17 AM   #101
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borii View Post

I suppose since there were no specifics listed in the original post it is all fair game
Idk which one if faster tho
Cobra jet or Boss 302S cause ones more track and the other is drag:/
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 10:07 AM   #102
Registered Member
Regular
 
fbakersc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: chapin
Region: South Carolina
Posts: 56
Ok then this should be the fasted Ford....Ashley Force funny car
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ForumRunner_20130410_110730.png
Views:	63
Size:	168.4 KB
ID:	101745  
fbakersc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 10:59 AM   #103
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbakersc View Post
Ok then this should be the fasted Ford....Ashley Force funny car
Well thats not made by ford, yes the block is.. But the body, frame and extra engine components were built by a seperate group.. So technically saying its not built or sold by ford so its not a stock mustang
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 12:17 PM   #104
Registered Member
Regular
 
mrkrabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99mustang99 View Post
Still a stock car sold technically tho? Even tho its not practical for street use
Cobra Jet is not street legal I believe
mrkrabz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 12:29 PM   #105
Registered Member
Regular
 
99mustang99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Piedmont
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkrabz View Post

Cobra Jet is not street legal I believe
Still a stock made mustang by ford?? Yes its not street practical but its still a mustang built by ford and bought from ford which makes the car a stock car, atleast that how i think about it..
99mustang99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > Ford Mustang | Wrenching, Care and General Topics > General Mustang Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to: 4.2L V6 Mustang Engine Swap Danger Dude Pre-2005 V6 Mustang 85 11-14-2015 08:51 PM
Useful Mustang Information - READ THIS FIRST! Trojan Horse 1979-1995 Mustang GT 24 11-19-2012 10:54 PM
For Sale: 2002 Mustang GT - $8000 jimmy_beaner Mustangs for Sale and Wanted 61 09-23-2012 03:44 PM
Cams For 3.8 akeemlucas_1 Pre-2005 V6 Mustang 7 04-25-2012 09:15 AM
Mustang Wheels and Tires FAQ: Come here for questions concerning tire size!! Zim Mustang Wheels & Tires 24 12-25-2010 11:55 PM

» Like Us On Facebook



12:31 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.