2011 v6 VS 1999 gt - Page 2 - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs > 2010-2014 V6 Mustang

Join Mustang Evolution Today

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 04-18-2012, 06:10 PM   #36
Registered User
Regular
 
OneBad3.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 347
OneBad3.7 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Hey nice car, what motor do you have in it, oh it's a v6. Oh.
Lmao dont u knock my 6!!!

__________________
"Yea tho i drive through the valley of rice i shall fear no turbo... for torque art with me"
*~* Not Your Everyday V6 *~*
OneBad3.7 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 06:37 PM   #37
Registered User
Regular
 
yugoboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
yugoboss is unknown around these parts
Not knocking anyones car, just stirring the pot.

yugoboss is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 06:49 PM   #38
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Not knocking anyones car, just stirring the pot.
You evil person! lol
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 07:03 PM   #39
Registered User
Regular
 
Bballing0416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 284
Bballing0416 is unknown around these parts
The 2011 v6 would deffinetly win....its got like 305 hp and the 99's dont have PI heads and verts are ver heavy
Bballing0416 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:16 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eturner

Then your comparison isn't valid because your comparing a modded car to a stock one!.. Lol. And then using that to say that the new V6 is better!... Lol. Do mod for mod and stock for stock if you want to see which is better!..
Duh stock for stock the gt would win! But us just having a tune and being able to beat one was my point! It shows how close the race really is. A tuned v6 can beat a stock 3v v8. A stock v6 can beat a 2v easily.
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:18 PM   #41
Registered User
Regular
 
Eturner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,524
Eturner is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bballing0416
The 2011 v6 would deffinetly win....its got like 305 hp and the 99's dont have PI heads and verts are ver heavy
Actually the '99s are PI motors, and not to mention the OP stated it has a 20 over bore on a rebuilt motor!.. That is going to help a bit more in the HP and torque department!...
Eturner is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:18 PM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Hey nice car, what motor do you have in it, oh it's a v6. Oh.
Hey look its another mustang v8. How unique.
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:35 PM   #43
Registered User
Regular
 
Eturner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,524
Eturner is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapinator126
the 99-04 2vs stock run 15s the 05-10 3vs run 14s stock.
MM&FF have a stock GT turn a 14.1 in the quarter back in '04!...

---------- Post added at 08:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by iwalkaline58

Hey look its another mustang v8. How unique.
I hope you do know that there are more V6 Mustangs than V8s!... Lol. Just saying is all!... Lol.
Eturner is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:43 PM   #44
Registered User
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 821
Rapinator126 is unknown around these parts
[QUOTE="Eturner"]

MM&FF have a stock GT turn a 14.1 in the quarter back in '04!...

ok and? i was just stating what a normal driver would turrn out and the times i have seen.

---------- Post added at 09:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 PM ----------

idk why it showed up like that lol. but i am just stating what a normal driver times i have seen. you know what i mean? i not bad mouthing the 2vs what so ever man i love them and have owned one as well as a 03 cobra 08 roush and now my 12 5.0. i want another 2v soon
Rapinator126 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:44 PM   #45
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eturner

MM&FF have a stock GT turn a 14.1 in the quarter back in '04!...
And a stock V6 PP does it in 13.7.. Base w/ 2.73 gears does it in 14.1. And I do believe our cars weigh more? Sooo, not bad for a V6 w/o any torque right?
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:56 PM   #46
Registered User
Regular
 
Eturner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,524
Eturner is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CYCLON37

And a stock V6 PP does it in 13.7.. Base w/ 2.73 gears does it in 14.1. And I do believe our cars weigh more? Sooo, not bad for a V6 w/o any torque right?
I would like to know where you are getting 13.7 at?.... A 3v GT runs that stock and it's faster than the new V6!... Lol.
Eturner is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:03 PM   #47
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eturner

I would like to know where you are getting 13.7 at?.... A 3v GT runs that stock and it's faster than the new V6!... Lol.
Ok, hopefully the link works.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qqzg...e_gdata_player
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:06 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eturner

MM&FF have a stock GT turn a 14.1 in the quarter back in '04!...

---------- Post added at 08:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 PM ----------



I hope you do know that there are more V6 Mustangs than V8s!... Lol. Just saying is all!... Lol.
Maybe newer mustangs but not older ones. Way more v8's out there. The old v6's go to where other normal old cars go after the motor is toast. The junk yard/scrap.
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:19 PM   #49
Registered User
Regular
 
Eturner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,524
Eturner is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CYCLON37
Nice video but!.. I'm calling some BS on that!.. The guy trying to that the new V6 has 308hp at the wheels!.. Or at least that's what he is hinting at!.. So if he is going to fudge that then he is going to fudge some other things as well!... Sorry Bro!..
Eturner is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:21 PM   #50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
No its 308 at the crank. Thats obvious.
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:26 PM   #51
Registered User
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 821
Rapinator126 is unknown around these parts
lets put it this way the new v6 with a procharger at 8psi gets it to 475 at the crank and about 418 to the tires verry impressive.
Rapinator126 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:31 PM   #52
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eturner

Nice video but!.. I'm calling some BS on that!.. The guy trying to that the new V6 has 308hp at the wheels!.. Or at least that's what he is hinting at!.. So if he is going to fudge that then he is going to fudge some other things as well!... Sorry Bro!..
Seriously?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsAmOH4gTDM&sns=em
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 09:33 PM   #53
Registered User
Regular
 
Eturner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,524
Eturner is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwalkaline58
No its 308 at the crank. Thats obvious.
Yes!.. Me, you, and the rest of us here know that!.. But when the narrator says it is "putting down 308hp!.." That to me says he means at the wheels!.. So then that would mean it is putting out about 360hp at the crank!.. I know Ford in the past has underrated some of their cars but never by that much!.. And if this guy is going to misrepresent that info, then he is going to misrepresent the rest!..

Look I'm bit of a Mustang fan boy, and I know some on here right now are thinking that I'm against the V6!.. I'm not!.. I've got alot of respect for the V6, most especially the new one!.. But I also like 100% truth and no BS!..
Eturner is offline  
Old 04-18-2012, 11:57 PM   #54
Registered User
Regular
 
OneBad3.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 347
OneBad3.7 is unknown around these parts
Oorah to that lol
__________________
"Yea tho i drive through the valley of rice i shall fear no turbo... for torque art with me"
*~* Not Your Everyday V6 *~*
OneBad3.7 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:22 AM   #55
Registered User
Regular
 
FORDGT14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 574
FORDGT14 is unknown around these parts
Re: 2011 v6 VS 1999 gt

I'm the one with the 99 Gt. And I have ran a high 13 at best and average low 14's at the track. My biggest issue is getting traction. Idk who said 99-04 Gts run 15s stock, but Im just letting you know that mine just has flowmasters, and I run low 14's on average.

We will be sure to update this thread as soon as the race is done. Hopefully get a video of it.
FORDGT14 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 07:09 AM   #56
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Should be a close race! GL to you both, and yes vid!!!
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 08:43 AM   #57
Registered User
Regular
 
Rapinator126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 821
Rapinator126 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by FORDGT14
I'm the one with the 99 Gt. And I have ran a high 13 at best and average low 14's at the track. My biggest issue is getting traction. Idk who said 99-04 Gts run 15s stock, but Im just letting you know that mine just has flowmasters, and I run low 14's on average.

We will be sure to update this thread as soon as the race is done. Hopefully get a video of it.
congrats to you then man. like i said b4 from the times i have seen from them. the 2vs are not impressive stock. they need some good mods
Rapinator126 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 08:57 AM   #58
Registered User
Regular
 
Whitelightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,211
Whitelightning is unknown around these parts
Just I add my 2 cents to it. I have a stock 2011 v6 and from a dead stop at a light it will beat a 98 gt. easy. From a roll the same can be said. A 5.0 fox body was a walk in the park and he was in a manual. Now a 05-09 gt is a little different. From a light, their torque pulls them but the mid range is where I caught up. (his didn't sound stock). Needless to say, the new v6 is on up there in previous gt's
__________________
Any Speed over 55 mph can kill you... thats why i drive 60
Whitelightning is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 11:50 AM   #59
Registered User
Regular
 
FORDGT14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 574
FORDGT14 is unknown around these parts
Re: 2011 v6 VS 1999 gt

Well #1, a 98 Gt is a Non PI engine. There is a HUGE difference in power between a 98 Gt and 99-04 Gts. The 99-04 Gts have PI engines (Performance Enhanced) The 98 Gts put out 215 hp on a good day stock. Of course your gona walk him. 98 was a very slow and horrible year for the Gt. IMO. Now the 99-04 Gts I have seen lay down about 230-240 rwhp on dynos. I can walk 98 and older Gts all day if they are stock.

Looking at the specs, most people would say that the 11 V6 will take a 99 Gt, I am one of those people. I figure if a 3v is having a hard time beating a new v6, then Im gona have hell just trying to keep up. I expect to stay with him through 2nd gear and then I think he will pull away after 3rd. And thats only if I get a perfect launch. But anything can happen.

We will try to make a video, it might be hard for me to record it because I have a 5 Speed. But we will try. Thanks everyone for your input.
FORDGT14 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:47 PM   #60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
Excuse my ignorance but what does PI and non PI mean?
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:50 PM   #61
Terminator Owner
Legacy
Staff
 
SpectorV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 26,037
SpectorV is just getting started.
Send a message via AIM to SpectorV
Re: 2011 v6 VS 1999 gt

Quote:
Originally Posted by iwalkaline58 View Post
Excuse my ignorance but what does PI and non PI mean?
in 99 the heads on the GT were made better and the PI heads were considered 99-04 GT heads and boosted power from 260 to 300~ (well actually the compression is a bit different as well but they raised power along with the PI intakes)

I will tell you from experience the 3.7L below about 3500 doesnt move very fast, its a top end motor for sure, but it has a high powerband and is fine once you rev it.
__________________
2003 Cobra Vert (Redfire) #3938 of 5082 @ 05/27/2003
472rwhp/493rwtq -Modification List - Dyno Sheet
2012 Mustang 3.7L M6 (Kona Blue)
2011 Ford Edge Sport (Red Metallic)
SpectorV is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:58 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpectorV

in 99 the heads on the GT were made better and the PI heads were considered 99-04 GT heads and boosted power from 260 to 300~ (well actually the compression is a bit different as well but they raised power along with the PI intakes)

I will tell you from experience the 3.7L below about 3500 doesnt move very fast, its a top end motor for sure, but it has a high powerband and is fine once you rev it.
Yeah the 3.7 is like fords version of a Honda motor. Nothing on the low end but top end power is awesome. I thought PI was referring to the heads because i knew they were different just wanted to double check though!
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 01:16 PM   #63
The Blue Dragon
Supporter
Staff
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,873
GrabberBlue5.0 is unknown around these parts
Has something to do withported heads

---------- Post added at 03:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:15 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrabberBlue5.0
Has something to do withported heads
Ha posted late lol
__________________
Cold startNEW!!
Tunnel ripNEW!!

AUGUST 2012 MOTM!!!!
GrabberBlue5.0 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 04:17 PM   #64
Registered User
Regular
 
Whitelightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,211
Whitelightning is unknown around these parts
Well you have to think, with every new generation the power increases. The 98 was a vert, had a cai, and not to be sexist but he was a 18 year old girl. What is PI? I've never heard of that.
__________________
Any Speed over 55 mph can kill you... thats why i drive 60
Whitelightning is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:56 AM   #65
Registered User
Regular
 
FORDGT14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 574
FORDGT14 is unknown around these parts
Re: 2011 v6 VS 1999 gt

PI means (performance Improved) or (Enhanced) whatever you like to say best. The changed the heads and intake in 99-04 Gts and up.

AND FOR THE RESULTS!!!!!

We raced quite a few times and had the same exact results every time we raced, we even switched drivers to see if it changed it, and no matter who drove either car, the results never changed. The 11 V6's nose was right at the 99 Gts door until about 100-110 and then slowly pulled away. So, in a 1/8 or a 1/4, a 99 Gt would win by just a few feet. But after 100-110, the V6 will pull away. Perfect match for each other. Both are amazing cars.

I see no reason what so ever for an 05-09 Gt to loose to an 11 V6. The driver means EVERYTHING. For instance, Sean (11 V6 Driver) raced an 02 Gt 5 speed coupe right before we raced and smoked it, I mean just straight up walked it, it was embarrassing lol I knew the driver had no idea what he was doing because you could hear the car not being shifted right and not down shifting when he should have. It had me worried when I saw how bad the 02 Gt got whipped. But in the end, my old 99 Gt did really good and so did Seans 11 V6. The 99-04 Gt is a perfect car to run against the new V6. The 05-09 Gts should have no problem beating a new V6 with a good driver.

And again, thanks everyone for you input.
FORDGT14 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:12 AM   #66
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Thanks for posting! What were the best times?
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 02:31 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
iwalkaline58 is unknown around these parts
How could the v6 pull away at 110 when its limited to 112mph? Or did he have a tune?
iwalkaline58 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:33 PM   #68
Registered User
Regular
 
OneBad3.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 347
OneBad3.7 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwalkaline58
How could the v6 pull away at 110 when its limited to 112mph? Or did he have a tune?
The v6 is limited to 125

---------- Post added at 03:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 PM ----------

And im just gonna say one thing the driver means the worlddddd, like the said the black 02 coupe, we saw under the hoo he had the same stuff i had a cai and exhaust, and me and him wasnt even close it was like he had no idea what to do all tho he did say "yea i can take it" but all in all it was a good time for being almost 15 years old a stock car (yea its a gt i get it) to perform the way it did against a brand new slightly modded car i can very impressed with both my lil v6 and his 14 year old gt, now when my sct tuner comes in it might be a new game
__________________
"Yea tho i drive through the valley of rice i shall fear no turbo... for torque art with me"
*~* Not Your Everyday V6 *~*
OneBad3.7 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:54 PM   #69
Registered User
Regular
 
CYCLON37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,798
CYCLON37 is unknown around these parts
Yeah, the tuner will make a big difference. Get the tune, and that GT will be done What was your best time??
CYCLON37 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 08:13 PM   #70
Registered User
Regular
 
OneBad3.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 347
OneBad3.7 is unknown around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CYCLON37
Yeah, the tuner will make a big difference. Get the tune, and that GT will be done What was your best time??
13.9

__________________
"Yea tho i drive through the valley of rice i shall fear no turbo... for torque art with me"
*~* Not Your Everyday V6 *~*
OneBad3.7 is offline  
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs > 2010-2014 V6 Mustang

Tags
2011 v6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off





» Like Us On Facebook


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


01:17 AM



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0