Which gas? - Page 2 - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 2011-2014 Mustang GT

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 03-14-2013, 08:24 PM   #36
Registered Member
Maverick2004054's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cooper City
Region: Florida
Posts: 130
Originally Posted by thejohncarlson View Post
All the charts that I see say that the higher the octane, the lower the BTU/gallon. Also, due to the fact that they burn slower, the latent heat of vaporization is lower as well.

I will give you this, the differences between 87 and 93 are so negligible it probably does not make a difference but, when you get up into 100+ octane gas, it burns considerably colder.
I'm not sure which charts you are looking at, meaning who made them, but you have to realize that they typically have to adjust the timing and compression ratio to make the charts come out correct unless they are extrapolated using a formula. Either way there are too many changing variables to rely solely on the chart. In theory you are correct that 100+ octane would burn cooler, but you have to see it relative to the amount of compression it was tested at as most engines dont typically like being outside the common range usually 87 to 96 Octane.

As for the amount of BTUs per gallon I think what you have is backwards but I'd have to check at work tomorrow, the longer hydrocarbon chains would tell me that there are more per Gallon, thus making it more dense with hydrocarbons. I know that sounds backwards, but I am pretty sure it is correct as it is a more pure fuel.

You are correct about the differences between 87 and 93 octane being negligible in the amount of BTUs but when looking at the required fuel in regards to the compression ratio they really are night and day. The reason why I recommend utilizing a higher octane than recommended every so often is based solely on the mechanical reasons that I am sure we all agree with. Ie. an engine running and tuned for 87 octane has a certain degree of timing for ignition. By delaying that ignition using a higher octane fuel you are delaying the burning within the cylinder thus getting more piston travel before detonation, this is why people say that higher octane burns hotter. You roughly have the same amount of BTUs but in less space.

If I messed up any of this let me know, I just quickly typed it up as I'm doing other things!
Maverick2004054 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-14-2013, 08:55 PM   #37
Registered Member
thejohncarlson's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2012
Region: Texas
Posts: 276
I see what you are saying and the information I am talking about is not related to any application. I am talking about the raw characteristics of the fuel so, it does not take compression into account.

I am by no means an expert regarding what is happening inside the cylinder. Based on my limited knowledge, I would think that the compression ratio in the cylinder stays basically the same no matter what fuel is being burned. I can't imagine there is enough of a difference to dramatically effect the temperature.
thejohncarlson is offline   Reply With Quote

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 1979-2015 Mustang GT || Tech and Talk > 2011-2014 Mustang GT

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

» Like Us On Facebook

12:05 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.