What should i add to my 1991 2.3l? - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > 2.3 Mustang



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 06-11-2012, 11:44 PM   #1
Registered Member
Regular
 
1991stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: New Mexico
Posts: 27
What should i add to my 1991 2.3l?

I've basically rebuilt this car from ground up it was a piece of trash that barely ran I've had it about a year and a half now just need to ask about what I should to do it cosmetically and with the engine
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1754727859.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	455.3 KB
ID:	54289   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-297373038.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	426.4 KB
ID:	54290  

Click image for larger version

Name:	image-2299278690.jpg
Views:	145
Size:	464.9 KB
ID:	54291  
1991stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-12-2012, 02:52 AM   #2
Registered Member
Regular
 
NeedSomeMods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Region: Texas
Posts: 775
Now that's a clean 4 cyl fox there.. Nice.
Interesting how you have the stripes.
If you're keeping the I4, I'd say turbo that thing!

Oh, and upload more pictures of the car if you want exterior opinions as well..
Rear, sides, angles, etc.

From the front though, it looks great.
__________________
2000 V6 - RIP
The '94 -
NeedSomeMods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 05:59 PM   #3
Registered Member
Regular
 
1991stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: New Mexico
Posts: 27
More pics of my car ill add more as soon as I wash it tomorrow
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-156540231.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	392.7 KB
ID:	54401   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-2801119825.jpg
Views:	128
Size:	477.5 KB
ID:	54402  

Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1154544056.jpg
Views:	135
Size:	413.6 KB
ID:	54404   Click image for larger version

Name:	image-820368970.jpg
Views:	126
Size:	437.3 KB
ID:	54405  

1991stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-12-2012, 10:15 PM   #4
Registered Member
Regular
 
aegischief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Region: North Carolina
Posts: 492
I'd say add 4 more cylinders to the motor. Nice work on the car BTW.
aegischief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 12:04 AM   #5
Registered Member
Regular
 
1991stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Region: New Mexico
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by aegischief
I'd say add 4 more cylinders to the motor. Nice work on the car BTW.
I wish I could haha out of mg price range right now though and thank you
1991stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 12:46 PM   #6
Road Trip!
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Arcadia
Region: Florida
Posts: 2,785
Great looking fox and I say add a cold air intake
93mstnglx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 02:11 PM   #7
Registered User
Newbie
 
Bad4banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Region: South Carolina
Posts: 7
I would say if you want any 4 banger motor performance except the turbo go to esslinger performance I run all their stuff in my mini stock and my daily driver never had any problems and their tuff running 8000 rpm constantly around a track will test that an they have the wins to back just my .02 cents worth
Bad4banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > 4 Cylinder | V6 | Classic Mustangs || Tech and Talk > 2.3 Mustang

« Debating | 105mph »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


» Like Us On Facebook



04:34 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.