New Boss 351 - Mustang Evolution

Go Back   Mustang Evolution > Shelby | ROUSH | Boss | Saleen | SVT || Tech and Talk > Boss Mustang



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about them here!
Old 11-04-2012, 11:12 AM   #1
Registered Member
Regular
 
1953fords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Region: Connecticut
Posts: 22
New Boss 351

Since the Boss 302 run of 2 years has ended. I wonder if Ford would be considering coming out with a Boss 351! They could use the new 5.8 motor from the GT500 but use it N/A.
Any thoughts??????
Russ
1953fords is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-04-2012, 11:14 AM   #2
Loc: Austin,TX
Regular
Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin
Region: Texas
Posts: 5,980
That would be awesome but dont think its gonna happen since they are gonna be doing a SVO style 4 banger in the future.
DDTCM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2012, 03:43 PM   #3
Registered Member
Regular
 
sally2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Region: Indiana
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1953fords
Since the Boss 302 run of 2 years has ended. I wonder if Ford would be considering coming out with a Boss 351! They could use the new 5.8 motor from the GT500 but use it N/A.
Any thoughts??????
Russ
How's bout a boss 429
sally2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-04-2012, 03:46 PM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
Regular
 
deadsp0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MidWorld
Region: Other
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1953fords
Since the Boss 302 run of 2 years has ended. I wonder if Ford would be considering coming out with a Boss 351! They could use the new 5.8 motor from the GT500 but use it N/A.
Any thoughts??????
Russ
The new 5.8 is a 355 btw..
__________________
That's unimpressive
deadsp0t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 05:35 PM   #5
Registered Member
Regular
 
Jza1736's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Region: New York
Posts: 185
Doubt it. Nothing special this year.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1665164625.jpg
Views:	440
Size:	295.9 KB
ID:	74904  
Jza1736 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 06:14 PM   #6
Registered Member
Regular
 
Robbiemustang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadsp0t

The new 5.8 is a 355 btw..
Are you sure?!?!? I thought a 5.8 was a 351
Robbiemustang96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 06:32 PM   #7
Moderator Emeritus
Regular
 
deadsp0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MidWorld
Region: Other
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbiemustang96

Are you sure?!?!? I thought a 5.8 was a 351
Yup
__________________
That's unimpressive
deadsp0t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 06:57 PM   #8
Registered Member
Regular
 
Robbiemustang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadsp0t

Yup
Are you still sure not being a D- bag or anything
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image-470304216.jpg
Views:	424
Size:	230.0 KB
ID:	74907  
Robbiemustang96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:05 PM   #9
Registered Member
Regular
 
06REDF1RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbiemustang96

Are you still sure not being a D- bag or anything
actually he is correct



Click image for larger version

Name:	image-1174325430.jpg
Views:	550
Size:	180.5 KB
ID:	74908

Also not being a d-bag just a bit closer
__________________
2004 GT Premium Package: mach 1 grille delete, 8" shorty antenna, CDC lightbar, borla stingers, UPR o/r x, Black chrome bumper inserts, redline tuning hood struts, white face gauges, raxiom smoked tail lights.
Born on 3/31/04
06REDF1RE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:12 PM   #10
Registered Member
Regular
 
Robbiemustang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 622
Arg we are both correct then :p lol
Robbiemustang96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:14 PM   #11
Registered Member
Regular
 
06REDF1RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 228
Lol we'll just agree to disagree
__________________
2004 GT Premium Package: mach 1 grille delete, 8" shorty antenna, CDC lightbar, borla stingers, UPR o/r x, Black chrome bumper inserts, redline tuning hood struts, white face gauges, raxiom smoked tail lights.
Born on 3/31/04
06REDF1RE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:17 PM   #12
Registered Member
Regular
 
Robbiemustang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by 06REDF1RE
Lol we'll just agree to disagree
Yep lol this is just like arguing weather a 302 is a 5.0 or a 4.9 lol
Robbiemustang96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:18 PM   #13
It's not me, it's you.
Regular
Supporter
 
primer2tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Region: Texas
Posts: 6,752

Name:   image-3635617.jpg
Views: 557
Size:  53.2 KB
Lol,
primer2tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:19 PM   #14
Registered Member
Regular
 
06REDF1RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbiemustang96

Yep lol this is just like arguing weather a 302 is a 5.0 or a 4.9 lol
Haha yeah we could go all day

But to get back on topic a Boss 351 would be bada$$
__________________
2004 GT Premium Package: mach 1 grille delete, 8" shorty antenna, CDC lightbar, borla stingers, UPR o/r x, Black chrome bumper inserts, redline tuning hood struts, white face gauges, raxiom smoked tail lights.
Born on 3/31/04
06REDF1RE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 07:20 PM   #15
Registered Member
Regular
 
Robbiemustang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Region: Illinois
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by primer2tone
Lol,
...... Ok who put my picture on the internet....
Robbiemustang96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 08:24 PM   #16
Evolution's Finest
Supporter
 
bigmac3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cleburne
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,036
Late to this argument but it appears that Ford should actually call it a 5.7L. Using the simple standard formula of bore(3.66")/2 squared x pi (3.1417) x stroke (4.165") x no of cylinders (8), one comes up with 350.567cu in. That is sort of a 351. Divide that by 61cu in (1 Litre) and you come up with 5.74L, which would round down to 5.7L. I guess that 5.8 sounds better.
__________________
Frank
1989 Blue LX Hatchback
2001 Red SVT Cobra Convertible (Phoenix)
2002 Black/Red GT (Ginger)
2011 Red Candy Metallic V6 (Manfred)
2016 Magnetic Metallic GT (Susie II)
bigmac3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 10:00 PM   #17
Registered Member
Regular
 
2300turboford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: london
Region: Kentucky
Posts: 2,903
Just like the 302 is acually a 4.9
__________________
"Racing is life ,anything before or after is just waiting "-the king of cool -Steve McQueen
2300turboford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 11:54 PM   #18
Evolution's Finest
Supporter
 
bigmac3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cleburne
Region: Texas
Posts: 1,036
The current 5.0 (Coyote) actually works out to 302.204. Converted to metric makes it a 4.954 which would round up to 5.0L. So we're good there. The old Windsor actually worked out to 301.603, converted to metric makes it 4.944 or truly a 4.9L. If we called them by cubic centimeters instead of Litres it would be a lot more accurate. Now how was that for a useless waste of time? LOL
__________________
Frank
1989 Blue LX Hatchback
2001 Red SVT Cobra Convertible (Phoenix)
2002 Black/Red GT (Ginger)
2011 Red Candy Metallic V6 (Manfred)
2016 Magnetic Metallic GT (Susie II)
bigmac3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 12:10 PM   #19
Registered Member
Regular
 
Mustang_96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mansfield, TX
Region: Texas
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbiemustang96 View Post

Are you still sure not being a D- bag or anything
what is the name of that app? And is it for Android.
Mustang_96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 12:23 AM   #20
Registered Member
Regular
 
Black on Boss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Perry, GA
Region: Georgia
Posts: 7,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmac3 View Post
The current 5.0 (Coyote) actually works out to 302.204. Converted to metric makes it a 4.954 which would round up to 5.0L. So we're good there. The old Windsor actually worked out to 301.603, converted to metric makes it 4.944 or truly a 4.9L. If we called them by cubic centimeters instead of Litres it would be a lot more accurate. Now how was that for a useless waste of time? LOL
Informative
Black on Boss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 12:27 AM   #21
Registered Member
Regular
 
Stanglover1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Region: Mississippi
Posts: 243
I bored my 302 so I think it's safe to call mine 5.0
Stanglover1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 12:29 AM   #22
Registered Member
Regular
 
Black on Boss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Perry, GA
Region: Georgia
Posts: 7,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanglover1966 View Post
I bored my 302 so I think it's safe to call mine 5.0
Lol
Black on Boss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > Shelby | ROUSH | Boss | Saleen | SVT || Tech and Talk > Boss Mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


» Like Us On Facebook



12:24 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

MustangEvolution.com is in no way associated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.