Register To Remove These Ads!

Support Our Sponsors!
 American Muscle  NQSPerformance  eBay

Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
Go Back   Mustang Evolution > Mustang Forums > V6 Mustang

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2009, 12:23 PM   #1
4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Newbie
 
Renegade 800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
City: Sandpoint
State: Idaho
Posts: 44
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Renegade 800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Are you a Mustang fan? If so we invite you to join MustangEvolution.com. Once you join you'll be able to post messages in our forums and upload pictures of your Mustang. You will also be able to browse our site with limited advertisements as a thank you for joining our community. What are you waiting for? Join up now and tell us a bit about your Mustang!
Old 04-08-2009, 12:27 PM   #2
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
IMPORTS SUCK
Regular
 
upton7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
City: flora
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 37
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
upton7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 01:45 PM   #3
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
WTF^^...
Staff
 
SpectorV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
City: Birmingham / Florence
State: Alabama
Posts: 30,593
Thanks: 18
Thanked 196 Times in 184 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SpectorV
__________________
2003 REDFIRE COBRA #3938 of 5082 @ 05/27/2003 1 of 414
Modification List, High Res Pictures, Dyno Sheet
440rwhp/483rwtq 10.9 A/F 12-15psi (new leaner numbers to come!)
SpectorV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 02:14 PM   #4
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
IMPORTS SUCK
Regular
 
upton7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
City: flora
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 37
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
upton7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 02:31 PM   #5
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 04:34 PM   #6
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 04:38 PM   #7
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 04:54 PM   #8
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 11:11 AM   #9
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
runvsofthisbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
City: Tampa
State: Florida
Posts: 169
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
__________________
2002 Automatic 3.8L True Blue Covertible
MAC CAI, MAC Chrome Shorty Headers, MAC OR H-pipe, 40 series flows, 25% UDP, KB Strut Tower: Mach 1 Grill, 8 inch antenna, Limo Tint, Parchment LightBar, Chrome 18x9 FR500s 275/35/18, GT foglights, Clarion head unit, audiobahn amp, kicker sub & speakers.
runvsofthisbull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 10:45 AM   #10
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 04:45 PM   #11
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 05:43 PM   #12
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:04 PM   #13
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
IMPORTS SUCK
Regular
 
upton7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
City: flora
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 37
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
upton7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 06:18 PM   #14
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 07:38 PM   #15
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
IMPORTS SUCK
Regular
 
upton7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
City: flora
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 37
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
upton7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 07:42 PM   #16
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
IMPORTS SUCK
Regular
 
upton7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
City: flora
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 37
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
upton7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 08:01 PM   #17
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:37 AM   #18
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:38 AM   #19
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:36 PM   #20
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 11:01 PM   #21
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
HIV negative since 1980!!!
Regular
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
RyansQuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:33 AM   #22
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Geaux Tigers!
Supporter
 
SaleenFiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
City: Walker
State: Louisiana
Posts: 1,220
Thanks: 8
Thanked 39 Times in 34 Posts
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamdat View Post
hahaha, what can i say? i love swinging from nuts! lol!
SaleenFiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 06:04 PM   #23
Re: 4.2L, High Compression compared to Supercharger.  
Registered User
Regular
 
stangaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
City: Livermore
State: California
Posts: 211
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
stangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford : Mustang GT Bad Boy Mark Martin High Proformance Mustang with SuperCharger Ebay Ford Mustangs 0 02-21-2009 03:00 PM
2010 Camaro vs. 2009 Challenger SRT8 compared by proxy... how will new Mustang do? mlars General Car Discussion 4 08-28-2008 11:54 AM
Some opinions on High Compression and 4.2 w/ M90 builds needed Kiljosh V6 Mustang 11 06-26-2007 12:01 PM
compression Js281GT 1996-2004 4.6 Mustang 17 01-10-2005 05:01 PM
GT-Take Offs Compared to name brands StangDoo98 V6 Mustang 13 03-22-2004 07:22 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
01:08 AM