Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
|
  |
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:17 PM
|
#36
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The V6 block is said to be better built than a 5.0 block, but that could just
mean in practical terms that it too would split in 1/2 at 500 RWHP too.
That would mean it is stronger in terms that each cylinder can handle
more HP than a 5.0 on a per-cylinder basis... but Matt is over that!
SC blocks are heavier and stronger, that is what the 99^ blocks are
patterned after according to Pete (who works at Ford) and he said it
was 99-04 blocks that were strongest, however 01-04 were internally
balanced which helps too. (less stress on mains and such)
To be safe Matt will probably yank the intakes and inspect the lifter valley,
that is where the blocks develop cracks. He works for Delk and they have
probably split several 5.0 
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
 
03-17-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#37
|
|
  |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Severn, MD
State: Maryland
Posts: 3,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
as far as i know, in 96, ford started using the SC block and head design in all the RWD 3.8L cars, but in 99, they were further refined, thats what i gathered in my research
Matt may have exceeded that 500rwhp mark, but it doesnt always mean the block will last, i have seen 750rwhp out of a stock block, and it lasted for almost a racing season, when it went, it went with a bang though, it was nasty
|
|
|
|
03-18-2005, 09:28 AM
|
#38
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
 |
 |
 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbird232ci
as far as i know, in 96, ford started using the SC block and head design in all the RWD 3.8L cars, but in 99, they were further refined, thats what i gathered in my research
Matt may have exceeded that 500rwhp mark, but it doesnt always mean the block will last, i have seen 750rwhp out of a stock block, and it lasted for almost a racing season, when it went, it went with a bang though, it was nasty
|
 |
 |
 |
That would be even better! 96-04 is a lot of blocks to choose from...
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
03-18-2005, 11:45 AM
|
#39
|
|
  |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Severn, MD
State: Maryland
Posts: 3,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ill try to recheck my sources, just so i dont spread wrong info around
|
|
|
|
03-18-2005, 12:02 PM
|
#40
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I know you are right about the heads, they have the SC head's deck surface
but I dunno about heat treating... that would be nice! They also have the 7mm
valvestem upgrades starting in 1996 which the SC heads did not have.
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
03-18-2005, 08:38 PM
|
#41
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Thread Killer
Join Date: Jul 2003
City: Murfreesboro
State: Tennessee
Posts: 4,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
I don't own a mustang at the moment
|
|
|
|
03-18-2005, 09:23 PM
|
#42
|
|
  |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Severn, MD
State: Maryland
Posts: 3,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
interesting, i wasnt aware of the heat treating, ill see if i can find more info
its funny, when youre car doesnt have any of the good 3.8L stuff, you learn a good amount about the stuff others take for granted and care less about
|
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 10:36 PM
|
#43
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ok now that i am back online.
i got 3.55 gears. and i am using a 95 block. look in the sig for new 1/4mile times.
__________________
The First and Only 9 Sec Production Based V6 Stang!!, First over 500rwhp, First and only over 600rwhp
60ft-1.42,1/8th mile-6.25@111mph,1/4 mile-9.83@136.65mph
Sponsored by:
WWW.DELKPERFORMANCE.COM
|
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 10:45 PM
|
#44
|
|
  |
|
|
|
WTF^^...
Join Date: May 2003
City: Birmingham / Florence
State: Alabama
Posts: 27,070
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
2003 REDFIRE COBRA #3938 of 5082 @ 05/27/2003 1 of 414
MGW Shifter, Stingers, JLT, SS Inserts, MM FLSFC & CC Plates, SS Lines, H&R Race springs, IRS Brace, MRT Hood Struts
ME.com Member #29 - 400rwhp/380rwtq
|
|
|
|
03-23-2005, 10:59 PM
|
#45
|
|
  |
|
|
|
postarama
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: Southaven
State: Mississippi
Posts: 24,430
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Kick ass man...your car was so awesome last weekend. Ya gotta keep us updated with everything.
__________________
"I'm not driving too fast...just flying too low"
Mine:
-87 ranger- broke
-03 SB Cobra vert- 2552 of 5082 Born 02/25/03
Our's:
90 7up vert - new project
|
|
|
|
03-24-2005, 07:16 AM
|
#46
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Great work Matt! Is this essentially the same top end that you used on the NA
3.8 that did so well? Stock valves and same port work? It's really doing well if
it is! Keep up the good work! 
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
03-24-2005, 09:40 PM
|
#47
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
 |
 |
 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGR
Great work Matt! Is this essentially the same top end that you used on the NA
3.8 that did so well? Stock valves and same port work? It's really doing well if
it is! Keep up the good work! 
|
 |
 |
 |
yea its the same heads,cam and lower intake that i used on the N/A setup. it still has the stock 94-95 valves and the same port work. the only difference is the box upper intake that i made for it.
__________________
The First and Only 9 Sec Production Based V6 Stang!!, First over 500rwhp, First and only over 600rwhp
60ft-1.42,1/8th mile-6.25@111mph,1/4 mile-9.83@136.65mph
Sponsored by:
WWW.DELKPERFORMANCE.COM
|
|
|
|
03-25-2005, 11:43 AM
|
#48
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
If you ever want to BV those heads and max out the lower give
me a call and I can fill you in on the peculiarities of those 2 items 
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
|