Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
|
  |
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 02:04 AM
|
#1
|
|
  |
|
Intake for 06 GT
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
City: Memphis
State: Tennessee
Posts: 18
|
Hey everybody. I am new to the board so if there has already been a thread on this please just post a link.
I just ordered a Vista Blue 06' GT that should arrive in 5 - 7 weeks and I am looking for an intake. I am thinking a K&N and a dyno tune. My other immediate mods will include H&R suspension and a Borla exhaust. Is there another intake that will provide more hp on the 3 valve? If so please let me know.
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 08:37 AM
|
#2
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
City: Severn
State: Maryland
Posts: 1,805
|
your not going to get much hp from a intake, just go with the cheapest fenderwell one you can find. exhaust is all preference catback wise..its what ever sound you like. not until you change the mid pipes and headers will you get any real gains.
__________________
Member #5 of the ME.com 5.0 Club
Current:
1985 Mustang GT Hatchback
Past:
1990 Mustang GT
1988 Mustang LX 5.0
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 08:46 AM
|
#3
|
|
  |
|
|
|
You want to **** me?
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Kansas City
State: Missouri
Posts: 12,398
|
I disagree with what bane said. Buy a nice intake like JLT so when you start upgrading more parts on your car, you're not going to be restricted by any airflow due to a crappy intake. Id recommend JLT, bbk, mac, any of the big names that make something for the 05+ cars.
__________________
-Mike
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 09:04 AM
|
#4
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
I will disagree with my friend Zim. The fact is just get the Lowest price CAI you can find that has the least amount of bends. I had a Densecharger I traded for a MAC. I would have not bought a MAC at $150 if I had to pay for it. In looking at the $50 CAI found on Ebay I see no difference in quality!!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 09:54 AM
|
#5
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
City: Severn
State: Maryland
Posts: 1,805
|
your paying the name engraved into the aluminum tube, I could goto home depot right now and make one out of pvc pipe and accomplish the same thing for what...$15 tops? it just wont look as pretty, and thats when paint gets involved 
__________________
Member #5 of the ME.com 5.0 Club
Current:
1985 Mustang GT Hatchback
Past:
1990 Mustang GT
1988 Mustang LX 5.0
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 04:33 PM
|
#6
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
City: Memphis
State: Tennessee
Posts: 18
|
Thanks for the help guys. I have no intention of adding headers or anything that might void my warranty. With an intake I can always do a quick switch back to stock if I need to see the dealer.
This car is a DD so the main thing I am interested in is upgrading the suspension to get rid of the pig like handeling. I am adding an exhaust for looks and sound. I just like the Borla.
I appreciate all the input. Some of the intakes I have seen were over $300. Any links to where I might pick up one of the ones you guys mentioned?
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 04:34 PM
|
#7
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Member With Privileges
Join Date: Oct 2003
City: Grand Rapids
State: Michigan
Posts: 4,578
|
agree with everyone except for zim 
__________________
-Derek-

Mustangs run but Birds fly..
|
|
|
|
07-19-2005, 09:14 PM
|
#8
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
In driving a couple of 05 GT's Their handling is far from what I would call a pig. I have driven many true sports cars and muscle cars past and present and with the exception of a few cars out there the 05 handles really good especially for a over 3000 lb car.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-20-2005, 12:22 AM
|
#9
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
City: Memphis
State: Tennessee
Posts: 18
|
Not to offend but with the suspension work I had done on my last auto X car it would pull over 1g on the skidpad. I have read from .84 to .88 for the new Stang, and my experience driving my friend's 05 tells me .85g at best.
The car tends to understeer a good bit and there is too much wheel hop. That is especially dangerous when taking a high speed corner. Just a couple of observations. Oh, and I am a suspension freak. It's all about the handeling.
|
|
|
|
07-20-2005, 06:37 AM
|
#10
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
I also have extensive suspension experience as well as racing experience in my 25 years of car building and modding. I did not say there was no room for improvement on the 05. I merely stated that compared to almost all cars stock from the factory the 05 Mustang is one of the best handling cars right off the showroom floor. All cars are set up for a bit of understeer from the factory. I have set my car up for handling the twisty roads I frequent in the mountains.
__________________
|
|
|
|
 
07-20-2005, 10:15 AM
|
#11
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Mustang Evo NEWB
Join Date: Aug 2004
City: millville
State: New Jersey
Posts: 4,858
|
C&L intake + matching diablosport tune showed ~22 HP gain to the wheels (5.0 mustangs magazine dyno tests)
that's the way I'd go personally..
__________________
1992 Mustang LX hatchback.. 1 of 542 black on black
2003 Regal GS - the beater/daily driver - somewhat stock. No its not a mustang, at least it's blown.
|
|
|
|
07-20-2005, 10:38 AM
|
#12
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
Who paid for that test I suspect almost all magazine articles now!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-20-2005, 01:29 PM
|
#13
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Legacy Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,080
|
intake + chip + gears/tires + exhaust = 12's in the 1/4 
__________________
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
-Adolf Hitler, 1935
|
|
|
|
07-21-2005, 05:24 AM
|
#14
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
City: Memphis
State: Tennessee
Posts: 18
|
I heard this before but it was a pulley kit instead of gears. I will put on everything other than the gears. Not trying to worsen the gas mileage any more than I have to.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2005, 06:56 AM
|
#15
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
He was joking. intake + chip + gears/tires + exhaust will not get you into the 12's unless you strap a rocket to the back of your stang.
Losing mileage with engine mods does not have to happen. Pulleys, gears, exhaust, CAI will not casue you to lose much gas mileage. You might actually gain in city driving as long as you keep your foot out of the throttle, in highway mileage you will lose about .5 to 1 mpg at 75mph with 3.73 gears and 1 to 1.5 mpg at 75 mph with 4.10's so it is not that bad. Also if you do engine mods like P&P heads, intakes and cam you still dont lose a lot unless you like stomping the pedal down.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-21-2005, 12:45 PM
|
#16
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Super Six Motorsports
Join Date: Mar 2005
City: Darlington
State: South Carolina
Posts: 173
|
Funny I acctualy gained mileage doing those.
__________________
96 GT 4.6 L
Ported 2004 Upper Plenum
B&M Shifter
Bassini O/R X Pipe
FRPP Adjustable Clutch Cable
UPR Extreme Triple Hook Quadrant
UPR Extreme Firewall Adjuster
Ford 11"Clutch Conversion
C&L MAF
WMS CAI
Aluminum Drive Shaft
95 V6 Vert: 4.2L swap, Trac Lock, Light Cam, Mac Shrorty Headers, More to come.
|
|
|
|
 
07-21-2005, 01:04 PM
|
#17
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
I gained in the city but lost a bit on the highway. I make the same trips to Chattanooga, Panama City Beach, Birmingham and Mobile and I lost 20 miles per tank. In the city I actually gained but only when I stay off the pedal.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-21-2005, 04:56 PM
|
#18
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Mustang Evo NEWB
Join Date: Aug 2004
City: millville
State: New Jersey
Posts: 4,858
|
with DRs and those mods (if they're quality ones) on an 05+ it most definitely should get you into the 12s.. hell they run 13.40s if not better out of the box
__________________
1992 Mustang LX hatchback.. 1 of 542 black on black
2003 Regal GS - the beater/daily driver - somewhat stock. No its not a mustang, at least it's blown.
|
|
|
|
 
07-22-2005, 12:50 AM
|
#19
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
City: Memphis
State: Tennessee
Posts: 18
|
I was talking to a guy who said he had a C&L with diablo sport, exhaust, pulley, and some street radials (guessing Mickey Thompson's) and supposedly he ran a 12.8. Not sure about this but a couple of my friends say it is true. Not sure if he had gears or not.
A friend of mine works at a local shop and they say the 05's dyno at 265 - 275 at the wheels brand new. He said with intake, exhaust, and dyno tune 300rwhp is common. I will know for sure when mine gets here, then I will post some #'s.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2005, 06:46 AM
|
#20
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,956
|
Sorry but a 300 HP O5 GT weighing 3450 is not running 12's with bolt-ons plain and simple. A 465 HP 03 Cobra is running high 11's low 12's. Where in the hell did those numbers come from!!!! Bone stock they are 13.6 to 13.9
__________________
Last edited by Danger Dude; 07-22-2005 at 07:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
07-22-2005, 05:35 PM
|
| | |