Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
|
  |
|
|
|
12-09-2005, 11:32 PM
|
#36
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
awesome ill let everyone know if i get em of not
|
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 03:43 PM
|
#37
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
I liek gramer
Join Date: Jan 2004
City: Birmingham
State: Alabama
Posts: 19,163
|
I have GT Takeoffs mounted under the V6 bumper.
It's ok to make new threads. 
__________________
Delta Sigma Phi - building better men since 1899
Last edited by WhiteStang99; 12-10-2005 at 03:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 04:24 PM
|
#38
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
milf hunter
Join Date: Apr 2005
City: Baton Rouge
State: Louisiana
Posts: 5,036
|
i have been looking into a stage 2+ power pack as well, the gains are around 70-80rwhp with the stage 2+..........so youre looking at about 240rwhp with an auto 99-04 v6......
__________________
|
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 08:24 PM
|
#39
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
thats the area i was looking into acutally as well around 230 though is what im looking at so i f i get more i can be suprised, but i hopefully will get the dual exhaust so i dont have to spend a ton of money for a whole kit or custom side exhaust
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 08:07 PM
|
#40
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
postarama
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: Jackson
State: Mississippi
Posts: 24,136
|
Yeh, I bought mach 1 exhaust, basically the same thing. Just slightly different mufflers, and after having them on for a year, I just ordered some new mufflers...gonna see how I like these new ones. But, it's a good starting point.
__________________
"I'm not driving too fast...just flying too low"
Mine:
-87 ranger- broke
-03 SB Cobra vert- 2552 of 5082 Born 02/25/03
Our's:
90 7up vert - new project
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#41
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
yeah, i won the dual exhaust for the car, now the hard part is finding a place to weld it up or i will just have to see where to cut it my self and use adapters to put it up for now, i know its not the way to actually do it, but until i can get it welded up i think thats the way i might have to do it, unless one of my buddies can weld it up for me
__________________
It's all about how fast you get from point A to point B, now how you get there
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#42
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
postarama
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: Jackson
State: Mississippi
Posts: 24,136
|
Go to an exhaust shop with the exhaust. Tell them you want your stock Y-pipe cut off before it starts the bend. Then you want two pipes bent and welded to go between what's left of your factory y-pipe and the new exhaust. It will all then fall into place. If you think you may be doing tranny work later...you won't want to weld it, get flanges put in or buy an adapter kit. I paid 100 bucks to have mine installed, anything around that is a pretty fair price.
__________________
"I'm not driving too fast...just flying too low"
Mine:
-87 ranger- broke
-03 SB Cobra vert- 2552 of 5082 Born 02/25/03
Our's:
90 7up vert - new project
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:40 PM
|
#43
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
ill find out, there is a place down from where i work, ill ask them and let ya know the price
__________________
It's all about how fast you get from point A to point B, now how you get there
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:43 PM
|
#44
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
postarama
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: Jackson
State: Mississippi
Posts: 24,136
|
Aight man. And it's never a bad thing to tip your exhaust guy...just a tip for future reference.
__________________
"I'm not driving too fast...just flying too low"
Mine:
-87 ranger- broke
-03 SB Cobra vert- 2552 of 5082 Born 02/25/03
Our's:
90 7up vert - new project
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:44 PM
|
#45
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
I liek gramer
Join Date: Jan 2004
City: Birmingham
State: Alabama
Posts: 19,163
|
^ true that.
__________________
Delta Sigma Phi - building better men since 1899
|
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 09:48 PM
|
#46
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
yeah i know that, the place i heard does weld jobs for like 30 bucks, but i havent seen thier work, ill see tomorrow, but I would think i would be good to pay him so you can get some discounts n stuff like that
__________________
It's all about how fast you get from point A to point B, now how you get there
Last edited by a00v6stang; 12-11-2005 at 09:51 PM.
|
|
|
|
12-12-2005, 07:14 AM
|
#47
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Cammed Baby!
Join Date: May 2003
City: Chicago 'Burbs
State: Illinois
Posts: 1,712
|
Definately have flanges welded in.
It will make any future changes or maintenance a lot easier.
__________________
2003 SVT Lightning #1059 of 4270
2000 Vert 4R70W
|
|
|
|
12-13-2005, 10:20 PM
|
#48
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
alright the exhaust is on its way, ill get some pics done when i have it put on
__________________
It's all about how fast you get from point A to point B, now how you get there
|
|
|
|
12-14-2005, 11:06 PM
|
#49
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
postarama
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: Jackson
State: Mississippi
Posts: 24,136
|
I don't want pics, I want vids lol
__________________
"I'm not driving too fast...just flying too low"
Mine:
-87 ranger- broke
-03 SB Cobra vert- 2552 of 5082 Born 02/25/03
Our's:
90 7up vert - new project
|
|
|
|
12-15-2005, 08:23 AM
|
#50
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
3.8stang
Join Date: Sep 2005
City: Lakemoor
State: Illinois
Posts: 222
|
no problem, went out to elgin the other day, went from a roll at 35 both in third and started to pull on him, but if you dont believe i can understand that one, hence i didnt have my camera on when i tried to record it..... but yeah, he woud want to go to the track so, whenever we go to the track. ill put some slips up, but i will remember to turn on my camera first..... 
__________________
It's all about how fast you get from point A to point B, now how you get there
|
|
|
|
12-30-2005, 10:35 PM
|
#51
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Senior Tech Advisor
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Burlington, NC
State: North Carolina
Posts: 2,685
|
Just a thought for you, but before I would spend 5K on a 3.8 trying to make it fast I would take that money and trade that thing for a GT.
__________________
 Rick Kilpatrick, AAS Automotive Systems Tech, Alamance Community College, Class of 99. 06 5 speed manual Mustang with Pony pkg : GT Mac Mufflers, true duals with one custom pipe. 2.5" system. GT bumper cover, all installed March 7&8 2006. AFE Stage 1 CAI, Motoblue Underdrive pulley, GT aluminum shifter knob, honeycomb rear blackout panel,and dash kit installed. Roush hood scoop and side window louvers installed. SS taillight trim has been installed, new alum. GT steering wheel installed.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2006, 04:10 PM
|
#52
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
State: Pennsylvania
Posts: 11
|
There is a site that can calculate the acceleration but it is not entirely accurate because you must maximize the power in ever shift.
http://www.web-cars.com/math/qtr_mile.html
2005 mustang v6 coupe (stock no adjustments): 3,351 lbs.
2000 mustang v6 coupe " ": 3,064lbs
then put in horsepower
just showing a way to find acceleration and quarter time
|
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 05:42 PM
|
#53
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 253
|
The 05 5spds put out some NICE power, I have seen two make 199rwhp with just some kind of exhaust, one of them was on my dyno. CAI + tune is worth another 14-15rwhp.
__________________
Justin Starkey
VMP Tuning - SCT Custom tuning, Mobile Dynojet 224xLC, SCT's #2 custom tuning dealer for 2006, Phone: 321-206-9369 Email: Justin@VMPTuning.com
2000 Mustang 3.8 A4 TT 450RWHP/475RWTQ 10.996@127 17psi stock 3.8
2006 F250 CC 4x4 6.0L 14.3 @ 93
2006 Mustang 4.0 M5 Vortech 13psi 350RWHP/346RWTQ wife's car
|
|
|
|
01-05-2006, 09:57 PM
|
#54
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
City: Mesa
State: Arizona
Posts: 63
|
From what I found out in another forum is the 2005 v6 manual is dyno'd about 180HP at the rearwheel bone stock and can easily hit 200 with a CAI,axel back muffler, and a good tune. The auto's are about anywere from 160 to 165 at the rearwheel stock and usually hit about 193 with the same mods.
I've never raced an older mustang so I don't know but you should give us a good run for the money!! lol
__________________
Procharger P1SC,3 Corecooler,42lb inj.
301whp & 300wtq @ 10psi dynojet SAE 106 degrees
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 08:18 AM
|
#55
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 253
|
I would agree with that. I made around 50 dyno runs on my dyno with an 05 v6 last week.
__________________
Justin Starkey
VMP Tuning - SCT Custom tuning, Mobile Dynojet 224xLC, SCT's #2 custom tuning dealer for 2006, Phone: 321-206-9369 Email: Justin@VMPTuning.com
2000 Mustang 3.8 A4 TT 450RWHP/475RWTQ 10.996@127 17psi stock 3.8
2006 F250 CC 4x4 6.0L 14.3 @ 93
2006 Mustang 4.0 M5 Vortech 13psi 350RWHP/346RWTQ wife's car
|
|
|
|
01-06-2006, 10:11 PM
|
#56
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
City: Mesa
State: Arizona
Posts: 63
|
That's cool to know that you've actually Dyno'd them your self though. That gets me stoked cause I have not dyno'd mine yet and you have dyno'd a few and seen simalier gains. Heck I have not even tuned my chip to the current mods I have. Im waiting till after I get my gears & Tlok.
Speaking of tuning and since you do it all day, which tuner would be best to use? I have a manual so I dont need to change all the shift points and firm them up and all that mumbo jumbo. I thought the SCT would be best but I've heard that the Diablo is better for manual's. Is this true? Does the Diable has all the same features as the SCT except for the Shift points?
__________________
Procharger P1SC,3 Corecooler,42lb inj.
301whp & 300wtq @ 10psi dynojet SAE 106 degrees
|
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 01:56 PM
|
#57
|
|
  |
|
Re: 2005 vs 2000
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
|
I have a "little"  experience speccing cams, and your heads stock, unported
flow really well. In fact, one of my old first generation split port cams and a
chip tune ONLY made 215 RWHP and 225 RWTQ with old standard regrind
lobes. I now recommend Comp Cams reground or new cams, the lobe ramps
are so much better that you can get a cam with everything you need for HP
and torque band both!
In fact, the cam above was a 207/215 and it did this:
RGR-Spec cam and chip (dyno-tune): 215 RWHP 225 RWTQ
A competitors complete package with ported heads, intakes, bigger
camshaft, and a tune made these numbers: 219 RWHP 210 RWTQ
A cam that is too big for your combo is a disaster! Not to say this same
"bigger cam" would not work better on a different combo, but the same
207/215 cam on a 4.2 stroker beat another bigger cam on a 4.2-ish hi$
stroker by 5 HP and 20 TQ!
In short, I'm available to help with your camming needs, and you can get
the regrind yourself, saving mucho $$$!
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude... | | |