MAF FACT or FICTION 70mm stock

[eagle05]

I read on another site that the 94 and 95 5.0 has a 70 mm MAF is that true?

[Tbird232ci]

Quote: Originally Posted by eagle05 I read on another site that the 94 and 95 5.0 has a 70 mm MAF is that true?

Yes, its true. But its still calibrated for 19# injectors.

[Zim]

I thought the GT's was 60mm and the cobra was a 65?

[eagle05]

funny how the 94 and 95 would have better flow with that big of a MAF and yet the HP dropped for those two years.

[SpectorV]

droped compared to what?

[03redfire cobra]

Quote: Originally Posted by eagle05 funny how the 94 and 95 would have better flow with that big of a MAF and yet the HP dropped for those two years.

didnt the 94 nd 95 have 225hp and the 96+ had 215hp?

[SpectorV]

no they 94-95 were "down graded" to 215 to make the 96 model look better. Just like the 93 model was set at 205hp

[eagle05]

I thought the 88 - 93 was rated at 235 and the 94 - 95 was rated at 215 I know the 94 - 95 didn't have the forged pistons like the 88 - 93 foxes did which is a bummer. But I have heard of a lot of guys running N2O without any problems in the 94 - 95 even without forged pistons.

[bbunt302]

1987 - 1992 : 225hp & 300 lbs/ft of torque, forged pistons
1993 - 1993 : 205hp & 275 lbs/ft of torque, hypereutectic pistons
1994 - 1995 : 215hp & 285 lbs/ft of torque, hypereutectic pistons

[Tbird232ci]

Who cares about horsepower numbers, most of them arnt event close to accurate.

The MAF's for those years are 70mm. The fox bodies got a 55mm.

[eagle05]

Has anyone dyno numbers on a stock 94 or 95 with the T5 transmission.

[Zim]

Quote: Originally Posted by eagle05 Has anyone dyno numbers on a stock 94 or 95 with the T5 transmission.

:wave2:

Mines not really the same setup as yours though lol

[Danger Dude]

The later model Fox bodies had 60mm that is what is on my stang. 94-98 V6's had 53mm T/B