Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
|
  |
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 03:19 PM
|
#1
|
|
  |
|
Auto vs Manual
|
|
#2 (I Wish I Could Lope Like A tC)
Join Date: Apr 2006
City: Pineville/Alexandria
State: Louisiana
Posts: 1,265
|
I have a auto 95 gt and i was thinkin about sellin mine and findin a manual..
Could someone help me make my decision by pointing out the pro and cons of the two..
__________________
(Project "TORQUE")
Mods - Off Road H w/ Flowmaster 40s and 3" x 22" Tips, Shiftkit, Shorties, and 4.10s
Soon to come - UDPs, Off Road X-Pipe, A/T Cooler, and 03' Cobra Rims
Club - Tha Crew Leader of Muscle Car Division
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 03:35 PM
|
#2
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
Manual Quicker off the starts unless you spend some substantial moneyb on the Auto
Manual is more fun to some than Auto's
Stock for stock the manual is faster do to less parasitic loss in the tranny. Typically around 15 horsepower advantage.
You can drive and drink coffee at the same time in traffic with an auto
You will have to change the clutch assembly a couple of times before you typically have to work on a auto
It is all in preference 
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 04:36 PM
|
#3
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
#2 (I Wish I Could Lope Like A tC)
Join Date: Apr 2006
City: Pineville/Alexandria
State: Louisiana
Posts: 1,265
|
Well my prefrence is a manual...i just thought i would ask...i figured there was more pros and cons to it than that...thanks for the input
__________________
(Project "TORQUE")
Mods - Off Road H w/ Flowmaster 40s and 3" x 22" Tips, Shiftkit, Shorties, and 4.10s
Soon to come - UDPs, Off Road X-Pipe, A/T Cooler, and 03' Cobra Rims
Club - Tha Crew Leader of Muscle Car Division
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 06:15 PM
|
#4
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Teh TC6!
Join Date: Aug 2005
City: Sheppard AFB
State: Texas
Posts: 3,966
|
__________________
Click the sig for a complete list of mods and pics.
Bewst!?
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 06:50 PM
|
#5
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
For a street car, I'd so much rather have a manual... as in I think an auto isn't really even a viable option.
A drag car is a different story entirely.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:21 PM
|
#6
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
My manual 06 is 10 times as sophisticated as your auto, thank you very much kind sir. 
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:45 PM
|
#8
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
My PATC Interceptor 4R70W can handle way more HP than you puny manual could ever stand without tearing it apart, thank you very much my distinguished gentleman in the bowels of Texas 
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:48 PM
|
#9
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
I was talking about the car as a whole. Obviously your transmission is made of steel and brawn.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:53 PM
|
#10
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
Your Stang is a overweight lard ass. It looks good and I would like to own it but it in no way has the character or the ability to mountian run like my Stang. Sure you will most likely rap me in the straight away but in the curves you big ass beast even with superior suspension would waddle around like a beached whale in places like The Tail of the Dragon my most honorable friend 
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 07:57 PM
|
#11
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
Alrighty then... I was talking about sophistication, not performance.
If you wanna talk performance, I'll bring the '90.
Oh yeah, manual. All the way. Have I said that yet??? 
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:06 PM
|
#12
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
that 90 chassis is the worst body for carving corners there was it has more twist than a twizzler stick even with suspension upgrades. Three of the cars I personally know the drivers who have screwed up at the Tail were driving fox body's. I would not want you to die going off the cliff so bring something slow and small so you get the hang of it first being a mountain curve Noobie, My fine oustanding and accomplished man!!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:11 PM
|
#13
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
You're showing your age Brother Corey.
PS> I still haven't changed my mind yet. Go with the manual. Why? Just because it is so much more fun to drive. Once you go manual, you never go back. I think that's how it went.
Last edited by bbunt302; 10-17-2006 at 08:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:20 PM
|
#14
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
What the hell. Did that guy steal that wing off a Delta 747 or what. That is a race car with 30,000 in suspension and a complete roll cage. It has been built way stiffer in the body to take the corners, Yours is not. I have seen Fox Bodies paint flake on the roof around the pillars from flexing so bad.
That Fox>your fox
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:33 PM
|
#15
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Bob is Good.
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Greenville
State: Texas
Posts: 5,168
|
Uh... mine has a 4-pt. cage, subframes, welded torque boxes, MM LCAs, Bilstein shocks and struts, H&R springs, MM swaybar end-links, MM C/C plates, along with every bushing in the suspension replaced.
I know that it's no where near the level of that car... but I still wouldn't be afraid to embarass an old man in the twisties with it. 
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:36 PM
|
#16
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Mustang Evo NEWB
Join Date: Aug 2004
City: millville
State: New Jersey
Posts: 4,903
|
Mine has that issue around the back 1/4 windows  silly hard launches 
__________________
1992 Mustang LX hatchback.. 1 of 542 black on black
2003 Regal GS - the beater/daily driver - somewhat stock. No its not a mustang, at least it's blown.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006, 08:44 PM
|
#17
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,970
|
You'll never embarrass this old man in the twisties. But you would get to tell me how my new SS inserts look from far away 
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006, 01:08 AM
|
#18
|
|
  |
|
Re: Auto vs Manual
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
State: South Carolina
Posts: 3,747
|
|
|
| | |