Welcome to Mustang Evolution.
|
  |
|
|
|
02-09-2004, 07:14 PM
|
#1
|
|
  |
|
OK lets get em started. FE and 385 series guys come on in
|
|
TIRED OF THE BS
Join Date: Feb 2004
City: .
Posts: 470
|
OK do tell what your packing. Everyone knows bigger is better LOL j/k
Ill start by letting my cat out of the bag. Im running a 557 in my 89 coupe. Thats a 4.44 bore 429-460 block with a 4.5" stroke. On top of that Im capable of using 400-500HP more with the NX kit I will be using this season.
So what you got?
|
|
|
|
02-11-2004, 04:18 PM
|
#2
|
|
  |
|
|
|
TIRED OF THE BS
Join Date: Feb 2004
City: .
Posts: 470
|
Confirmed wife picked up a 70 460 to install in her 84 project car. It will be mild running high 11s or low 12s. Gotta love a woman who loves cubes and racing 
|
|
|
|
02-11-2004, 04:49 PM
|
#3
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Severn, MD
State: Maryland
Posts: 3,920
|
how much power is the 429/460 block capable of before you risk breaking it? i hear about 800rwhp
|
|
|
|
02-11-2004, 05:31 PM
|
#4
|
|
  |
|
|
|
TIRED OF THE BS
Join Date: Feb 2004
City: .
Posts: 470
|
Depends on what block your using?
Im shoving hopefully 1000 with a SCJ block and Im not worried.
|
|
|
|
02-17-2004, 02:36 PM
|
#5
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
My dad use to race a 460 in his 69 falcon. it's was decently fast. it ran in the 10's
__________________
2003 Silverado Z71
Mods:
K&N filter, Black diamond plate toolbox, and billet grille on the way.
Future mods:
6" lift kit, rims and tires, Catback, Rhino lining, System
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 05:32 PM
|
#6
|
|
  |
|
|
|
TIRED OF THE BS
Join Date: Feb 2004
City: .
Posts: 470
|
Yeah the 385 can be made quick for cheap.
|
|
|
|
02-20-2004, 08:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
|
I have always wanted to drop a carbed 460 into an 85 Mustang GT. I saw one that had a 460 under the stock hood, with an 82 GT hood scoop that really made me want one, too. I never would have know a 460 could fit so stealthy, if I had not seen it for myself.
It was not even a radical setup, EGR dual plane 4BB intake, stock carb modified to flow around 760cfm, aluminum heads of some type, mild cam, but it would do 11's. It was heavy, but not too bad, according to the owner. Hell, it even had the dual snorkel air cleaner housing with 7.5 liter 4bbl H.O. on it. That was awesome, IMHO 
|
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 01:11 PM
|
#10
|
|
  |
|
|
|
I can has Mustang?
Join Date: May 2003
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Posts: 26,852
|
bah forgot to turn off guest accounts on this forum :oops:
__________________
|
|
|
|
03-06-2004, 01:37 PM
|
#11
|
|
  |
|
|
|
TIRED OF THE BS
Join Date: Feb 2004
City: .
Posts: 470
|
LOL..
700HP and runs 5.7 in 1/4 :shock: Must only weigh like 100lbs hahaha
Oh yeah BTW see ya troll :wave:
|
|
|
|
03-07-2004, 08:52 PM
|
#12
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
City: Londonderry, NH
State: New Hampshire
Posts: 5,403
|
lol
__________________
-Charles
|
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 09:53 AM
|
#13
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
|
BBF heads (even the small valve ones) can easily support
500 BHP with porting and cam... I saw an intake test in SuperFord
that got nearly 1hp/cube (I believe they got around 450)
in a 30 over 460 (466) running an Edelbrock Performer and
really mild cam, unported passenger car heads (small chamber & small valves)
I believe the cam was a 218/228 grind, pretty small for such a big engine.
But V6 practice gets ~ 1HP/Cube using smaller cams that are roller 
I did it using a 215* lobe with only .495" lift and I have seen similar
results on 5.0's using a 218* flat tappet lobe (good heads tho).
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
03-23-2004, 09:55 AM
|
#14
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
|
BTW, I have ported BBF heads, it was a pleasure to have
all that room to work, and compared to Pontiac 400 or 455
heads, the Ford stuff is way nicer 
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
06-21-2004, 02:21 PM
|
#15
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Canada
Posts: 1
|
Whats the difference between a 427 BB and a 428 BB? My dad salvaged most of 427 out of a wrecked 68 GT500 that I want to put into my 66 Coupe but This guy offered to sell me a incomplete 428 and parts for it to put into my 66. Common sense dictates that the 428 would seem better because its bigger (only by 1 cubic inch) but the 427 is out of a high end 68. Which one is better and more heavy duty. I heard the 427 was more of a racing block like the 385. Im not really looking for super performance, I just want a stock rebuild and I want the engine to last when I pound on it if nessesary. Any Input would be awesome. Im still considering leaving the 289 under the hood and putting the BB in a later model.
|
|
|
|
07-06-2004, 03:14 PM
|
#16
|
|
  |
|
|
|
The Mustang's Human Twin
Join Date: May 2003
City: Terre Haute, SC for a bit
State: Indiana
Posts: 1,638
|
the 427 and 428 are the same style, but the 428 had a smaller bore and ~4" stroke.
Using a 428 crank in a 427 block makes around a 455" plus engine, depending on overbore. The 428 is best for street and the 427 makes HP at higher RPM's.
Good head porting is essential for any size engine, keeyed towards the cam and
RPM range to match the overall intended use of the engine. There are plenty of
head options too.
__________________
Originally Posted by Flex:
You are the true cam master dude...
|
|
|
|
07-06-2004, 03:44 PM
|
#17
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Christian & proud of it
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: La Vernia
State: Texas
Posts: 2,384
|
i got a 240 cubic inch beast V-6 i just wish i had a 281 
__________________
"The LORD shall judge the people:judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to mine integrity that is in me." PSALM 7:8

Also Featuring: 2003 Suzuki Katana 600
In Texas? check out www.lonestarstangs.com
|
|
|
|
|