08-25-2004, 01:50 PM
|
#1
|
|
  |
|
What do you guys think?
|
|
Jeep Boy
Join Date: May 2003
City: Harvest
State: Alabama
Posts: 11,882
|
Well I have decided that instead of going with a newer mustang, I am going to go old school classic style. I just think I will enjoy it more. Anyway here are two I was looking at:
1970 w/ 351W
Its very clean and I really like it except the color (wich can be changed)
or
1967 w/ 289
Definately a bit of a fixer upper, but would be fun and it is cheaper.
So what do you guys think, vote in the poll and tell me wich one you like best.
__________________
Last edited by n8r; 08-25-2004 at 01:57 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 01:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
|
You want to **** me?
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Kansas City
State: Missouri
Posts: 12,367
|
umm... id go with a new car. Those old ones arent the greatest things for daily drivers.
__________________
-Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 01:57 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can has Mustang?
Join Date: May 2003
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Posts: 26,482
|
I still vote for newer but if anyhting get the 351
__________________
 |
 |
 |
Quote:
[23:27] BamaStangGuy: what it is
[23:28] Tiffeny: not much yo
[23:28] BamaStangGuy: Sitting here. Drinking Sam Adams Summer Ale and listening to ghetto rap
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 01:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeep Boy
Join Date: May 2003
City: Harvest
State: Alabama
Posts: 11,882
|
Well, I have my mind made up, so of the two wich one do you like?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:04 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can has Mustang?
Join Date: May 2003
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Posts: 26,482
|
uh huh sure you have Nate sure you have  
__________________
|
|
|
Quote:
[23:27] BamaStangGuy: what it is
[23:28] Tiffeny: not much yo
[23:28] BamaStangGuy: Sitting here. Drinking Sam Adams Summer Ale and listening to ghetto rap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:06 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeep Boy
Join Date: May 2003
City: Harvest
State: Alabama
Posts: 11,882
|
rotfllmfao omfg stfu n00b!!! lol w00t 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taking life one day at a time
Join Date: May 2003
City: Simpsonville
State: South Carolina
Posts: 10,879
|
BAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAA Nate could not make up his mind if he had to. That is why he bought one of those 8 Balls so he could get answers to the questions he never seems to get straight.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:11 PM
|
#8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 794
|
I picked the 67... Go with what you think you would be happier with...
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:35 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member With Privileges
Join Date: Oct 2003
City: Grand Rapids
State: Michigan
Posts: 4,578
|
Ive heard that too many times to believe you, on topid ill have to say the 1970 car, just has more of a muscular look to it IMO
__________________
-Derek-
Mustangs run but Birds fly.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 02:43 PM
|
#10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer of Beers
Join Date: Jul 2004
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Posts: 4,956
|
1970
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 03:24 PM
|
#11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Severn, MD
State: Maryland
Posts: 3,920
|
the 70, less common
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 03:41 PM
|
#12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
City: Gulf Breeze
State: Florida
Posts: 4,689
|
I say the 70 aswell , more motor
__________________
-Tony
'99 cobra 'vert
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 06:29 PM
|
#13
|
|
|
|
|
|
^needs more bondo
Join Date: Sep 2003
City: Modesto
State: California
Posts: 9,346
|
go with the 70 for the power. the 67 needs alot to make her look good, whereas the 70 is already there.
__________________
-Thomas-
2003 Redfire Cobra "Ruby" - Mine Again!
1990 Eclipse GSX - Project "get it running and out of the garage"
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 06:48 PM
|
#14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian & proud of it
Join Date: Jun 2004
City: La Vernia
State: Texas
Posts: 2,384
|
personally i'd look more and find a 70 fastback i dont like the non fastback 70-73's
but from those 2 the 67
__________________
"The LORD shall judge the people:judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to mine integrity that is in me." PSALM 7:8
Also Featuring: 2003 Suzuki Katana 600
In Texas? check out www.lonestarstangs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 06:54 PM
|
#15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: No where PA
Posts: 2,739
|
67 man all the way, the 351 wasnt that powerful plus by 1970 they had alot of stuff on them to make the engines alot more complex. in 1967 there was very little. plus i dont like the styling on 70-87 or so stangs. 1967 all the way man.
__________________
Delta Sigma Phi
building better men since 1899
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 07:06 PM
|
#16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member With Privileges
Join Date: Oct 2003
City: Grand Rapids
State: Michigan
Posts: 4,578
|
early 70s were still good engines it is the mid/later 70s when the smog crap got into effect and then the underpowered mustang2 ect..
__________________
-Derek-
Mustangs run but Birds fly..
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 07:18 PM
|
#17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
City: No where PA
Posts: 2,739
|
yea but still 67 to 70 there was a good bit of diffrence between the emissions and all. plus the 67 was a very light car and if u rebuild the engine and ways and decide to mod it you can get that sucker to fly just b/c of the weight.
__________________
Delta Sigma Phi
building better men since 1899
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 07:23 PM
|
#18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuck off
Join Date: Apr 2004
State: Europe
Posts: 9,189
|
what the hell does all that mean |
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2004, 07:38 PM
|
#19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member With Privileges
Join Date: Oct 2003
City: Grand Rapids
State: Michigan
Posts: 4,578
|
| | |
