Mustang Evolution Forum banner

1 - 20 of 32 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Do many members own the 15 GT or Ecoboost? I hear the Ecoboost will beat a GT with just an intake/tune, but was wondering what everyones thoughts were on that topic? Also, whats everyones thoughts on the mods you have done so far?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,586 Posts
Do not believe that one bit. As the fastest eco boost right now is a 11.77 it has everything done to it also. Fuel system,upgraded turbo (55mm), weight reduction. Ect

Now I'm curious to see what this thing will do with say a 62mm turbo, e85, built motor, bored out some, headwork Ect. 600 + rwhp would make it a sick little car.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,710 Posts
Do many members own the 15 GT or Ecoboost? I hear the Ecoboost will beat a GT with just an intake/tune, but was wondering what everyones thoughts were on that topic? Also, whats everyones thoughts on the mods you have done so far?
That statement needs some context. A tuned ecoboost CAN beat a GT in the 1/4 if the GT is stock or VERY lightly modded. This is coming from someone who has been doing the turbo 4 thing for a very long time, i like them, i respect them, but you cant just make blanket statements like that.

Now, from a roll, i think the ecoboost has a pretty good shot as well. I've tuned several turbo 4 cylinder cars on E85, and while they're typically 300-500 lbs lighter than a 5.0, they're also usually making upwards of 380-400 wtq. So, lightweight and a lot of torque makes it easy for a turbo car to get a pretty good jump on most cars they race, sometimes a higher horsepower car can pull back a win, and sometimes it cant. It just depends on the mods done to each car.

Do not believe that one bit. As the fastest eco boost right now is a 11.77 it has everything done to it also. Fuel system,upgraded turbo (55mm), weight reduction. Ect

Now I'm curious to see what this thing will do with say a 62mm turbo, e85, built motor, bored out some, headwork Ect. 600 + rwhp would make it a sick little car.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
That MAP car going 11.77 makes 501 whp and 464 wtq on stock motor and stock fuel system, which is pretty solid from a modern Turbo 4. Time will tell how long it lasts at that level, but 500 whp isnt hard for a modern 4 cylinder, the 464 wtq however, depending on how early in the RPM band it hits, will be the deciding factor.

I really, really, really like working with turbo 4s, but i'm still torn on how i feel about the ecoboost. Not because i think a turbo 4 in a mustang is wrong, just that i think the main perk of them is being light and powerful, and at 3500 lbs the EB really is just a bit too heavy, and just a bit underpowered... kinda falls in that awkward spot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,586 Posts
That statement needs some context. A tuned ecoboost CAN beat a GT in the 1/4 if the GT is stock or VERY lightly modded. This is coming from someone who has been doing the turbo 4 thing for a very long time, i like them, i respect them, but you cant just make blanket statements like that.

Now, from a roll, i think the ecoboost has a pretty good shot as well. I've tuned several turbo 4 cylinder cars on E85, and while they're typically 300-500 lbs lighter than a 5.0, they're also usually making upwards of 380-400 wtq. So, lightweight and a lot of torque makes it easy for a turbo car to get a pretty good jump on most cars they race, sometimes a higher horsepower car can pull back a win, and sometimes it cant. It just depends on the mods done to each car.



That MAP car going 11.77 makes 501 whp and 464 wtq on stock motor and stock fuel system, which is pretty solid from a modern Turbo 4. Time will tell how long it lasts at that level, but 500 whp isnt hard for a modern 4 cylinder, the 464 wtq however, depending on how early in the RPM band it hits, will be the deciding factor.

I really, really, really like working with turbo 4s, but i'm still torn on how i feel about the ecoboost. Not because i think a turbo 4 in a mustang is wrong, just that i think the main perk of them is being light and powerful, and at 3500 lbs the EB really is just a bit too heavy, and just a bit underpowered... kinda falls in that awkward spot.
The fastest one recorded is not on the stock fuel system. It has a custom system from jpc and a ***** load of weight reduction.

The MAP car has not been confirmed. Also the one who set the record is a all out race car and makes 150hp less than the map car. (353 at the tires )

So let's talk about the map car. Makes 500hp and runs 11.7 not impressive. From a roll lol not going to happen.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,710 Posts
The fastest one recorded is not on the stock fuel system. It has a custom system from jpc and a ***** load of weight reduction.

The MAP car has not been confirmed. Also the one who set the record is a all out race car and makes 150hp less than the map car. (353 at the tires )

So let's talk about the map car. Makes 500hp and runs 11.7 not impressive. From a roll lol not going to happen.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
You're right, i mixed the cars up, I remember now the stripped one going 11.7 on stock turbo. That one does have a fuel system, but ~350 shouldn't need it as that car still has tons of head room, i imagine they're just using it for testing.

I've seen videos of the MAP car run, but cant find it on my phone right now.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,586 Posts
You're right, i mixed the cars up, I remember now the stripped one going 11.7 on stock turbo. That one does have a fuel system, but ~350 shouldn't need it as that car still has tons of head room, i imagine they're just using it for testing.

I've seen videos of the MAP car run, but cant find it on my phone right now.
I prefer the map car just for the power. But I'm not going to lie I really did expect more. I was hoping for 10's honestly. I think the car still falls on its face up top. More tuning and they should be able to come past this. It leaves hard

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app

---------- Post added at 09:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 AM ----------

The MAP car has a higher ET I believe it was 121? Vs the 117 from the other car

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,586 Posts
The one making 350 had a aftermarket 55mm precision turbo also.
Once he does his converter I believe he will see mid -high 10's. Then hopefully he will turn the boost up to hit low to mid 500's

MMR supposedly has one in the works also. They won't release much info on it really though. Patiently waiting to see what it does. They did say It will be a built motor, bigger turbo so we will see.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
Eco boost beats GT?

Do many members own the 15 GT or Ecoboost? I hear the Ecoboost will beat a GT with just an intake/tune, but was wondering what everyones thoughts were on that topic? Also, whats everyones thoughts on the mods you have done so far?
The only people who are saying that are the ones who wish they'd have got the GT. A 4 cal has no business in a performance car IMO, it just doesn't seem right. Inthought hard about it before I pulled the trigger for the '15 GT Premium w/PP. When I say a performance car, I'm referring to an American muscle car/hot rod, not some exotic machine costing in the hundreds of thousands.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,710 Posts
The only people who are saying that are the ones who wish they'd have got the GT. A 4 cal has no business in a performance car IMO, it just doesn't seem right. Inthought hard about it before I pulled the trigger for the '15 GT Premium w/PP. When I say a performance car, I'm referring to an American muscle car/hot rod, not some exotic machine costing in the hundreds of thousands.
please, go on?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,653 Posts
The only people who are saying that are the ones who wish they'd have got the GT. A 4 cal has no business in a performance car IMO, it just doesn't seem right. Inthought hard about it before I pulled the trigger for the '15 GT Premium w/PP. When I say a performance car, I'm referring to an American muscle car/hot rod, not some exotic machine costing in the hundreds of thousands.
But the issue is that the 2015 model is no longer an American Muscle hot rod looking car. It looks nothing like American Muscle. The american muscle look died with the S197. The 2015 now is a very refined euro looking sports car. 4 bang away with it.

Of course this is a whole other thread topic but funny when people say a 4 cylinder doesn't belong in a performance vehicle. Why not?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
No 4 banger

But the issue is that the 2015 model is no longer an American Muscle hot rod looking car. It looks nothing like American Muscle. The american muscle look died with the S197. The 2015 now is a very refined euro looking sports car. 4 bang away with it.

Of course this is a whole other thread topic but funny when people say a 4 cylinder doesn't belong in a performance vehicle. Why not?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
Specifically, my thought is that among the various Mustang models, the GT represents the "Mustang" we all remember from the muscle car days of the sixties. The Mustang was in the middle of all that and still carries on that muscle car personality. When I start the GT up it reminds me of my '66 Olds 4 4 2, tri-power and my '68 Roadrunner. A 4 banger in the middle of all that? LOL
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,653 Posts
Specifically, my thought is that among the various Mustang models, the GT represents the "Mustang" we all remember from the muscle car days of the sixties. The Mustang was in the middle of all that and still carries on that muscle car personality. When I start the GT up it reminds me of my '66 Olds 4 4 2, tri-power and my '68 Roadrunner. A 4 banger in the middle of all that? LOL
The Ford motor corporation would most likely disagree with you about the 4 banger has no place. The mustang has evolved and cars displacemets are evolving too. There will always be a place in car enthusists for big displacement engines and the V8 rules.

The age old saying there is no replacement for displacement is archaic and that's until technology takes over. Taking over, Ford Gt 650 ecoboost V6. The vast majority of mustang owners don't give a crap about owning a V8. They want a good looking performance car and at 310 HP 325 lbs torque the 4 banger fits that. It gets better fuel millage than he 5.0 and looks just the same.

The majority of the consumers don't care about their car having a rumble of the V8 or 60's muscle car sound. I bet you for every one 2015 5.0 I see on the road I have seen ten 4 bangers. There are far more 4 bangers on the road that I see compared to the V6 and V8 models.

Personally, I don't think I would buy a 4 banger either but they do have a place in today's car market and performance vehicle. Again, the new mustang is not American muscle looking. Its a euro looking refined sports car that has the name mustang and has a mustang emblem on it. American Muscle died with the S197

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
820 Posts
Unfortunately it's the first Mustang step on the journey of oh crap were almost out of oil in the ground.
I'm going to try to ride the gas suckin , smog spewin , NASCAR train all the way to my dirt nap. Lucky for me, I'm 44 so probably a geezer to most of you.
You guys will have to see the days of Eco leaf, Google mustangs someday:)
You're kids will be bragging about how many gigawatts their Mouse stang has.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,653 Posts
Unfortunately it's the first Mustang step on the journey of oh crap were almost out of oil in the ground.
I'm going to try to ride the gas suckin , smog spewin , NASCAR train all the way to my dirt nap. Lucky for me, I'm 44 so probably a geezer to most of you.
You guys will have to see the days of Eco leaf, Google mustangs someday:)
You're kids will be bragging about how many gigawatts their Mouse stang has.
Ba ha ha ha. They won't know any different and they will be happy with their leaf stang. It will probably go 0-60 in 3 seconds and go 400 miles on one electric charge.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
4 banger v v-8

The Ford motor corporation would most likely disagree with you about the 4 banger has no place. The mustang has evolved and cars displacemets are evolving too. There will always be a place in car enthusists for big displacement engines and the V8 rules.

The age old saying there is no replacement for displacement is archaic and that's until technology takes over. Taking over, Ford Gt 650 ecoboost V6. The vast majority of mustang owners don't give a crap about owning a V8. They want a good looking performance car and at 310 HP 325 lbs torque the 4 banger fits that. It gets better fuel millage than he 5.0 and looks just the same.

The majority of the consumers don't care about their car having a rumble of the V8 or 60's muscle car sound. I bet you for every one 2015 5.0 I see on the road I have seen ten 4 bangers. There are far more 4 bangers on the road that I see compared to the V6 and V8 models.

Personally, I don't think I would buy a 4 banger either but they do have a place in today's car market and performance vehicle. Again, the new mustang is not American muscle looking. Its a euro looking refined sports car that has the name mustang and has a mustang emblem on it. American Muscle died with the S197

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
Well, for a car that's, according to you, very European and bears little resemblance to the old muscle cars, it looks like Mustang to me. So, you pays your money and you makes your choice. I just do not think that some folks (NOT EVERYBODY) who have purchased a 4 banger or V-6 does not think that he/she should have completed the deal and got the GT at some point down the road.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
Geezer

Unfortunately it's the first Mustang step on the journey of oh crap were almost out of oil in the ground.
I'm going to try to ride the gas suckin , smog spewin , NASCAR train all the way to my dirt nap. Lucky for me, I'm 44 so probably a geezer to most of you.
You guys will have to see the days of Eco leaf, Google mustangs someday:)
You're kids will be bragging about how many gigawatts their Mouse stang has.
I'm 75, so you have a way to go, relatively speaking.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,981 Posts
When I start the GT up it reminds me of my '66 Olds 4 4 2, tri-power and my '68 Roadrunner. A 4 banger in the middle of all that? LOL
I will never tire of starting up our 2015 GT.........or of second gear full throttle runs in tunnels. Both make me smile big time, every time...........just don't think thatsa gonna happen with half the number of cylinders.
 
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
Top