Mustang Evolution Forum banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,057 Posts
No. But I've seen several foxes on Craigslist where the owner posted boss Mustang on it. I guess they think because it has a 302, it must be a boss lol

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,981 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
I've seen much worse --- but the complete lack of any top would be a deal breaker for me.
From some angles, this 'Stang looks OK --- NOT gorgeous, but certainly OK.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,308 Posts
A cross between a Fox Body and a Mustang II :hide:
Just saying :whistling:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,981 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
It says it has a top... but it's no less ugly lol
I don't think so.....they are saying that the "stock" Mustang has a top and then comparing the weight of one WITH a top to one without.

and the whole dealio weighs in at only 3,360 pounds, about a 10% reduction over a stock Mustang GT ragtop.

Of course that stock Mustang has a top, while this car is branded as a Roadster. With its capped back seat section and lack of any sort of weather protection evident, I’d say the diet came with some questionable trade offs.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
562 Posts
I don't think so.....they are saying that the "stock" Mustang has a top and then comparing the weight of one WITH a top to one without.



and the whole dealio weighs in at only 3,360 pounds, about a 10% reduction over a stock Mustang GT ragtop.



Of course that stock Mustang has a top, while this car is branded as a Roadster. With its capped back seat section and lack of any sort of weather protection evident, I’d say the diet came with some questionable trade offs.

Yeah... reread it... said the STOCK one had one. Whoops.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top