what he said.ZimStang said:yeah it does look sweet... id try talkin to justin from VMP, he knows quite a lot about nitrous since hes a dealer
Here's a tip: **** you.tire said:oh boy another ricer.
You're going to critique my purchasing a direct-port kit that has nothing but advantages over a normal kit just because... I can afford it? Get a job you jealous *****.tire said:putting direct port n2o on a stock v6 is like feeding caviar (sp?) to a homeless bum. he'd be happy with just a sandwich ya know.
I was hoping you'd answer this one. That's just the kind of post I was looking for.Monkey said:direct port nitrous is safer on all cars especially 99+ v6 mustangs. The reason is because nitrous leans out on the corner cylinders (1,3,4,6) and runs rich in the middle two (2,5). Anyway, a single fogger style system is hard to tune a large (over 100) shot because of that. especially with the split port which has 2 runners per cylinder which is twice the error possiblity.
Furthermore, the shots are different with direct port. You run 60,90,120 shots, and a 120 direct port nitrous shot is safe on the stock engine (just as safe as the 100 fogger system shot... it's safe but at the absolut limit and not something you go around doing all the time)
To get a dp n2o setup, you will need some custom fabrication because you will need something like an intake spacer.... however it has to be used to lift up the lower intake off the heads instead of the upper off the lower. the individual fogger units are sprayed into each combustion chamber in the head.
I hope this helps, if not, ask more questions
i'll send you a PM tomorrow. have a good night! :good:Laser02 said:Here's a tip: **** you.
You're going to critique my purchasing a direct-port kit that has nothing but advantages over a normal kit just because... I can afford it? Get a job you jealous *****.
direct port is wet. it mixes the fuel and nitrous in the proper amount in each cylinder instead of a large amount in the intake snorkle and relying on it to distribute correctly. direct port is safer than any fogger system, wet or dryTheGmKiller331 said:I suggest a wet system over the direct port.Theres a lot of things to consider and to do to set that type of system up.And considering the gains i dont think the work would be worth it when you can run a wet system and have the same thing with a lot easier installation which makes for less problems and easier trouble shooting if a problem is to occur.