You are looking at 3 wtq per liter difference between the two cars. That is nothing.
The fact that the new GM LT1 makes more torque at just 1750 RPM and carries it (and more) from there to 6500 RPM is an absolutely impressive powerband.
If you want to go the per liter route, the mighty Mustang 5.0 makes less torque per liter than a 2.4L Honda Accord (174 wtq) ... at the tires.
See how silly your argument is?
Did I argue? all I'm saying is GM has always had to put more cubes for similar results. I could give 2 craps less on the torque rating of a Honda Accord I'm still not driving one. So if you guys want put Camaro's or Hondas on a pedestal have at it! Go buy one buy em both. Me and my Mustang have a deeper relationship than that I'm sticking with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Mustang Evolution