[tully]

The 2010 would easily win. You must remember that a 13 second car back in the 60's was considered spectacularly quick. A 67/68 Stock GT 500 KR was a low-mid 14 second car, quick for the day, but not especially quick by modern standards.

 

[aswynn95]

Yet the new muscle cars will show the old ones their tail lights almost every time. Furthermore for a car to make it to 100k miles was very rare back in 1960's, today it's expected... It's called progress man.

 

[mervyn]

The new one would certainly be faster in cornering.

The suspension on the 67 is pretty basic.

I have a 68 Mustang which has had suspension work done to improve it (shelby mod, lowered, sway bars, updated shocks, etc) - but my late model Ford sedan would still beat it for cornering.

Not in a straight line tho.

 

[rosiyn]

depends on a lot of things as we all know this to be true, gear ratios, 4 speed vs 5 or 6 speed, weight, etc... honestly i think the 67 would take it off the line till about 80 mph, then the 2010 would walk by it

 

[sutton]

The new mustang GT 500 has 540hp. It would rape the 67 shelby. There is no question. The 67 was probably pushing about 250hp by the new standard.

 

[harailt]

'67 only because its cooler. XD

 

[thormond]

Newer one.

 

[hristun]

none

XD

 

[jaye]

I agree with Lee. All you have to do is google it on the internet.