Mustang Evolution Forum banner

Horsepower and money

5.3K views 70 replies 15 participants last post by  Panther140  
Drop a 5.3 in it with a turbo and you won't have those problems anymo' lol. Plus you don't have to deal with the VVT crap.


Can I say "****" on here? Lol... can't even say "****" on here.. I guess Ill have to say "crap" instead smfh
Even with a carburetor, you still need a computer to control the ignition system.
 
Lol lets go there. I am an A&P mechanic. First of all most light aircraft is carbed. You're right. They have magnetos as ignition. Get into anything that goes above 12.5k feet it's most likely fuel injected and run low tension ignition. And more likely than that it will be turbo-supercharged. In aircrafts cases you make more power with fuel injection and has a wider range of altitude operation. We will skip jet engines for sake of argument which are fuel injected to a certain extent.


Sent from my iPhone using Mustang Evolution
This is correct. And I would like to add that "modern" aviation piston engine technology is roughly 80 years old! This is, mostly, due to the extremely expensive FAA certification process that aviation engines must undergo before they are able to be sold for use in a FAA certified aircraft. It is a process that not many corporations are willing to finance... Even Honda couldn't make any financial sense of bringing a thoroughly modern engine to the market. The certification process stifles new technology from being used.

Automotive engines and aviation engines is an "apples and oranges" comparison.
And you missed a hell of a lot of things that can go wrong with a carburetor Panther.
 
That looks like a neat little engine.
I haven't really been paying much attention to the happenings in the aviation industry lately... And I have always loved prop planes, so I rarely paid much attention to jets.
Business jets seem to be the strongest segment of General Aviation, right now, so it makes sense that Honda would team up with General Electric and bring an engine to that market.
About 15 years ago, Honda designed a direct drive, water cooled, opposed 4 cylinder engine that looked very promising. They did a feasibility study with Teledyne Continental to market the engine, and that was as far as it went. General Aviation took a big hit post 9/11, and the mortgage crisis. The cost of certification, and the already small pool of buyers for the engines, well, let's just say that it wouldn't have made the shareholders of either company, big fans of the project.

No matter. I like the simple 1930's design of the engines. They are simple and reliable, although, maybe not as efficient as they could be.

Here is the Honda prototype.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Mustang Evolution mobile app
 

Attachments